"Community",
Adaptation and the Vietnamese in Toronto |
By Mark Edward Pfeifer
Ó Copyright by Mark Edward Pfeifer
(1999)
Abstract/Acknowledgements/Table
of Contents - [ Chapters - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 ] - Appendices - References
Cited
CHAPTER FOUR
DEMOGRAPHY OF THE TORONTO VIETNAMESE
INTRODUCTION
The following chapter will assess the social demography of the
Vietnamese ethnic origin population residing in the Toronto CMA. Utilizing census data,
the demographic distribution of the enumerated Vietnamese aggregate will be compared to
that associated with the total population of the metropolitan area as a whole as well as
several other significantly sized "visible minority" groups. This demographic
profile is intended to provide a contextual basis to facilitate the analysis of Vietnamese
adaptation in subsequent chapters. This chapter discusses the movement of Vietnamese to
Toronto in waves of migration and the varying social characteristics of individuals who
came to the city in these differing time periods. The remainder of the chapter compares
the Vietnamese population enumerated in the 1991 census to the entire Toronto CMA
population in terms of its distribution among the variables of age and gender, immigrant
status, period of arrival in Canada, immigrant and citizenship status, knowledge of
official languages, educational background, birth rates, and religious affiliation.
WAVES OF MIGRATION
Scholars have identified several streams of Vietnamese migration to
North America since 1975. Prior to 1975, only very small numbers of Vietnamese lived in
the United States and Canada. Most of these individuals were representatives of the South
Vietnam government or students who had studied at American and Canadian universities in
the 1950s, 1960s or early 1970s. The first wave of refugees arrived in the immediate
period following the Fall of Saigon in the spring of 1975. A second wave of refugees came
to Canada and the United States after 1976 and continued to arrive through the early
1990s. Another sizable group of Vietnamese has been sponsored as refugees and more
commonly as immigrants by family members already residing in North America since the
mid-1980s.
The first wave of Vietnamese refugees were primarily army officers,
middle-level bureaucrats, students, and professionals associated with the former South
Vietnamese government. A good number of these people were well-educated and from middle to
upper class economic backgrounds. Members of this initial group of refugees typically had
lived in large population centres in Vietnam with regular exposure to western culture and
the English language due to their contact with foreign officials during the French
occupation and subsequent American involvement in Vietnam (Dorais et al., 1987; Gold,
1992; Rutledge, 1992).
In 1978, natural disasters and political persecution, as well as
continued regional conflict in Indochina, precipitated a renewed exodus of refugees.
Residents of the former South Vietnam continued to flee. Many of the Vietnamese who left
the country in 1978 or later, escaped by sea, often in dangerously unfit vessels. The
"boat people" who survived the trip sought asylum in refugee camps located in
neighbouring nations including Thailand, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. In response
to the situation, a conference was held in Geneva, Switzerland, at which several western
countries, including Canada and the United States, agreed to step up their intake of
Vietnamese and other Indochinese refugees. The second wave of Vietnamese migrants were a
far more diverse group compared to the more homogenous first wave. A higher proportion of
the latter arrivals came from rural as opposed to urban settings and persons from Central
and North Vietnam were better represented in the second wave of refugees. In general,
these latter-arriving Vietnamese possessed more limited educational backgrounds and
English-speaking skills. In addition, the socioeconomic background of the second wave
refugees was more diverse than that of their counterparts who were resettled earlier. A
larger percentage of these Vietnamese had been employed in primary occupations such as
farming and fishing, although significant proportions had also worked in professional
jobs, the military, governmental positions or commercial enterprise in Vietnam (Dorais et
al., 1987; Rumbaut, 1989a; Rumbaut, 1989b; Dorais, 1991; Gold, 1992; Rutledge, 1992;
Rumbaut, 1989a; Hung and Haines, 1996).
In Canada, the Vietnamese population is disproportionately composed of
second wave arrivals compared to that in the United States. While 145,000 Vietnamese came
to the U.S. immediately following the 1975 collapse of the Thieu regime in South Vietnam,
only about 6,000 Vietnamese came to Canada at this time (Indra, 1987). Large numbers of
Vietnamese began coming to Canada in 1978, following the Geneva conference organized to
deal with the Indochinese refugee crisis, as federal officials substantially increased the
number of Indochinese refugees they were willing to accept (Dorais et al., 1987; Indra,
1987; Wilson, 1995). The Canadian governments decision to increase refugee quotas
was supplemented by the establishment of a parallel private sponsorship system, which was
encouraged by the federal government and coordinated primarily by church-affiliated
organizations (Adelman, 1982; Lam, 1996). By 1982, more than 60,000 Vietnamese,
Cambodians, and Laotians had been resettled through the means of both private and
government sponsorship (Indra, 1987; Wilson 1995). Table 4.1 shows the number of permanent
residents from Vietnam who arrived in Toronto annually from 1978 to 1993, according to
Department of Immigration and Citizenship records. These figures obviously include both
ethnic Vietnamese and ethnic Chinese who had resided in Vietnam. Several important trends
are evident in the data. First, it is not surprising that the largest number of refugees
arrived in the Toronto metropolitan area from Vietnam in 1979 and 1980 at the time of the
"Boat People" crisis. The refugee intake decreased significantly in the early
and mid-1980s. In the 1988-1991 period, the number of refugees coming to Toronto from
Vietnam rose again, reflecting the renewed resettlement of Vietnamese who had been
residing in camps located throughout Southeast Asia and Hong Kong in particular. While not
shown in the data, persons originating from North Vietnam constituted a larger proportion
of this latter wave compared to a decade earlier (Cam Chau Tran, Personal Interview, July
27, 1997).
In the 1990s, Vietnamese sponsored by family members have become by far
the most significant component of the overall migration flow. This situation reflects the
fact that many of the Vietnamese who arrived in Canada in the late 1970s through the early
to mid-1980s have become relatively well established in Canadian society and have
subsequently sponsored the arrival of parents and siblings left back in Vietnam. The
number of Vietnamese arriving in Toronto as independent immigrants peaked during the
mid-1980s. The rise in new arrivals in the independent category in 1984 and 1985 appears
to be something of an anomaly. In both the 1978-1983 and 1986-1993 periods those
Vietnamese coming to Toronto as independent immigrants constituted a much smaller
proportion of the migration compared to those who either came as refugees or were
sponsored by relatives.
TABLE 4.1
PERMANENT RESIDENTS FROM VIETNAM, ARRIVING IN TORONTO
BY CATEGORY OF ENTRY, 1978-1993
| YEAR |
SPONSORSHIPS |
REFUGEE |
INDEPENDENT |
TOTAL |
|
1978 |
0 |
88 |
13 |
101 |
1979 |
24 |
2650 |
9 |
2683 |
1980 |
24 |
2504 |
27 |
2555 |
1981 |
118 |
776 |
85 |
979 |
1982 |
192 |
559 |
173 |
924 |
1983 |
434 |
449 |
384 |
1267 |
1984 |
734 |
604 |
1163 |
2501 |
1985 |
627 |
736 |
733 |
2096 |
1986 |
438 |
670 |
176 |
1284 |
1987 |
354 |
635 |
133 |
1122 |
1988 |
432 |
854 |
78 |
1364 |
1989 |
706 |
1186 |
56 |
1948 |
1990 |
763 |
814 |
159 |
1736 |
1991 |
1019 |
495 |
233 |
1747 |
1992 |
1108 |
491 |
178 |
1777 |
1993 |
1249 |
256 |
134 |
1639 |
|
Total |
8,222 |
13,767 |
3,734 |
25,723 |
Source: Department of Immigration and Citizenship,
Government of Canada. From Warwick R. Wilson, "Socio-Geographic Aspects of
Settlement, Adjustment and Mobility: The Vietnamese in Toronto (Canada), 1981-1994",
Research Paper Presented to the 7th Biennial Conference of the
Association for Canadian Studies in Australia and New Zealand at Latrobe University,
Melbourne, Australia, February 16-18th, 1995, p. 50.
SECONDARY MIGRATION
The location of private sponsors throughout Canada ensured an
initially high degree of geographic dispersal of the Vietnamese throughout different
regions of Canada. Subsequently, a range of factors have combined to stimulate the
secondary migration of Vietnamese away from their initial sites of resettlement to the
largest population centres in the country. Settlement services, such as English language
training and employment training, were to be found mostly in the larger Canadian cities as
opposed to rural locations or smaller towns and cities. In addition, employment
opportunities for refugees and immigrants were perceived to be far greater in the larger
urban centres. Furthermore, sizable Vietnamese population aggregations and the presence of
family and friends as well as co-ethnic social services, commercial activities, and ethnic
associations could only be found in the largest cities, also attracting Vietnamese
resettled elsewhere in Canada. Finally, the extreme winter cold in some areas motivated
many Vietnamese who were first placed in more remote regions to relocate to areas with
more moderate climates including Southern Ontario, the Montreal area and the Vancouver
region (Lavoie, 1989; Wilson, 1995).
VIETNAMESE POPULATIONS IN CANADIAN METROPOLITAN AREAS AND WITHIN THE
TORONTO CMA
In 1996, Statistics Canada estimated that over 130,000 Vietnamese
resided in Canada (Table 4.2). According to the 1996 census, Toronto possessed about
42,000 enumerated individuals claiming a Vietnamese ethnic origin either as a single or
multiple response on the census form in 1996. Among the other metropolitan areas in
Canada, Montreal was a distant second to Toronto with close to 28,000 enumerated
Vietnamese. Vancouver was next with around 16,000 Vietnamese counted. Approximately 10,000
Vietnamese were tallied in Calgary and about 8,000 in Edmonton. Ottawa, Winnipeg,
Kitchener-Waterloo, Hamilton, London and Windsor were other Canadian CMAs where more than
1000 Vietnamese were counted in 1996.
Comparisons of the Vietnamese mother tongue population in the major
Toronto CMA municipalities clearly show an expansion of the proportion of Vietnamese
living in suburban parts of the metropolitan area (Table 4.3). In 1986, just over 50% of
all Vietnamese individuals enumerated in the CMA lived in the City of Toronto compared to
just over 1/3 in 1996. Conversely, the population residing in the city of North York
increased from about 15% to around 20% in the same time period. About 1/5 of the total
Vietnamese population lived in the Peel Region municipalities of Brampton and Mississauga
in 1996 compared to about 12% in 1986. At the same time, the percentage of Vietnamese in
the CMA living in Metropolitan Toronto decreased from about 85% to just under ¾ of the
total enumerated population. Table 4.3 also clearly shows that the highest growth rates of
the Vietnamese population over the decade were in outlying portions of the metropolitan
area including North York, Mississauga, and Brampton as opposed to central city Toronto.
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
Period of Arrival
In comparison to the total immigrant population and members of
other minority groups residing in the Toronto CMA, the Vietnamese population was
distinguished by the relative recency of its arrival within Canada in 1991 (Table 4.4).
Just over 1/4 of the Vietnamese had come to Canada in the 1971-1980 decade, while over 70%
of the tabulated population had arrived in 1981 or later. Of all the minority groups, the
Vietnamese possessed the largest share of arrivals between 1981 and 1991. By contrast,
only about 20% of the total enumerated immigrant population of Toronto had entered the
country over the most recent ten year period accounted for in these census figures.
TABLE 4.2
VIETNAMESE ETHNIC ORIGIN POPULATION1
CANADA, ONTARIO, MAJOR CMAS, 1991 AND 1996
|
|
Population
1991 |
Population
1996 |
% of Canadian
Total, 1996 |
% Growth Rate
1991-1996 |
|
| Toronto |
CMA |
24,550 |
41,740 |
30.5 |
70.0 |
| Ottawa |
CMA |
4,340 |
6,615 |
4.8 |
52.4 |
| Kitchener |
CMA |
2,445 |
2,950 |
2.2 |
20.7 |
| Hamilton |
CMA |
1,870 |
2,825 |
2.1 |
51.1 |
| London |
CMA |
1,275 |
1,990 |
1.5 |
56.1 |
| Windsor |
CMA |
880 |
1,440 |
1.1 |
63.6 |
| Ontario |
|
38,545 |
62,055 |
45.4 |
61.0 |
|
| Montreal |
CMA |
19,265 |
25,335 |
18.5 |
31.5 |
| Vancouver |
CMA |
10,095 |
16,865 |
12.3 |
67.1 |
| Calgary |
CMA |
7,255 |
10,110 |
7.4 |
39.4 |
| Edmonton |
CMA |
6,780 |
7,770 |
5.7 |
13.3 |
| Winnipeg |
CMA |
3,330 |
2,750 |
2.0 |
-17.4 |
| Canada |
|
94,250 |
136,810 |
100.0 |
45.1 |
|
1 Ethnic Origin Population includes those enumerated
individuals who listed Vietnamese as part of either a single or multiple response to the
ethnic origin question on the census form.
Source: Statistics Canada, 1991 and 1996.
TABLE 4.3
VIETNAMESE MOTHER TONGUE POPULATION
TORONTO CMA, MAJOR MUNICIPAL SUBDIVISIONS, 1986, 1996
|
|
Population
1986 |
% of 1986
CMA Total |
Population
1996 |
% of 1996
CMA Total |
% Increase
1986-1996 |
|
| Toronto |
(City) |
4,580 |
51.6 |
11,170 |
34.6 |
144 |
| North |
York |
1,390 |
15.7 |
6,655 |
20.6 |
379 |
| York |
(City) |
655 |
7.4 |
3,125 |
9.7 |
377 |
| Scarborough |
|
455 |
5.2 |
1,465 |
4.5 |
222 |
| Etobicoke |
|
275 |
3.1 |
1,350 |
4.2 |
391 |
| East |
York |
155 |
1.8 |
180 |
0.6 |
16 |
| Metro |
Toronto |
7,510 |
84.7 |
23,945 |
74.2 |
219 |
|
| Mississauga |
|
850 |
9.6 |
5,560 |
17.2 |
554 |
| Brampton |
|
240 |
2.7 |
1,270 |
3.9 |
429 |
| Peel |
Region1 |
1,090 |
12.3 |
6,830 |
21.2 |
527 |
|
| Toronto |
CMA |
8,665 |
100.0 |
32,290 |
100.0 |
272 |
|
1 Peel Region numbers include cities of Mississauga and
Brampton only
Source: Statistics Canada, 1986, 1996
IMMIGRANT AND CITIZENSHIP STATUS
In 1991, the Vietnamese ethnic origin population exhibited the
largest proportion of immigrants among any of the visible minority groups in the Toronto
CMA (Table 4.5). The immigrant proportion of the Vietnamese population 82% -
outdistanced any of the other predominantly immigrant minority groups. In terms of
citizenship status (Table 4.5), about 62% of the Vietnamese population tallied in the
Toronto metropolitan area possessed Canadian citizenship in the last census. This figure,
while significantly lower than the 84% enumerated among the population as a whole, was
comparable to that tabulated among several other predominantly immigrant minority groups
including Koreans, Filipinos, Chinese, and South Asians.
GENDER DISTRIBUTION
According to 1991 census figures, the Vietnamese population in the
Toronto CMA exhibited a gender imbalance (Table 4.6). About 54% of the enumerated
population were males in 1991. The existence of a disproportionate number of males as
opposed to females in the Toronto Vietnamese population was also noted by several research
informants, providing support for the census figures. The gender balance within the
Vietnamese population contrasts with that of the total population and most of the other
major minority groups within the Toronto CMA. The existence of a male majority among the
Vietnamese population in Toronto likely reflects the fact that young men were
disproportionately represented in the refugee flow which escaped from Vietnam in the late
1970s and through to the early 1990s (Rutledge, 1992; Hung and Haines, 1996).
TABLE 4.4
PERIOD OF ARRIVAL
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
By Period of Arrival, %
|
Arrivals by Decade |
Recent Arrivals |
|
Prior to 1961 |
1961- 1970 |
1971- 1980 |
1981- 1991 |
1981- 1987 |
1988- 1991 |
| Total Imm. Population |
57.4 |
12.2 |
11.3 |
19.1 |
9.6 |
9.5 |
| Vietnamese |
0.1 |
0.4 |
27.1 |
72.5 |
45.3 |
27.2 |
| Blacks |
2.8 |
18.7 |
40.5 |
38.0 |
20.8 |
17.3 |
| South Asians |
0.4 |
8.9 |
37.3 |
53.4 |
26.7 |
26.7 |
| Chinese |
2.6 |
8.0 |
30.6 |
58.8 |
27.3 |
31.5 |
| Koreans |
0.3 |
9.1 |
48.3 |
42.3 |
23.3 |
19.0 |
| Japanese |
14.5 |
18.0 |
31.0 |
36.6 |
21.3 |
15.2 |
| Filipinos |
0.4 |
7.2 |
38.3 |
54.1 |
22.3 |
31.9 |
| Southeast Asians |
1.5 |
1.7 |
29.1 |
67.7 |
41.8 |
26.0 |
| West Asians/Arabs |
1.8 |
11.5 |
19.9 |
66.7 |
27.7 |
39.0 |
| Latin Americans |
0.7 |
4.4 |
31.9 |
63.0 |
31.1 |
31.9 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile
of Visible Minorities:
Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division,
1995.
TABLE 4.5
CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION STATUS
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
%
Canadian Other Immi- Non- Non-
Citizenship Citizenship grant Imm. Permanent
|
Canadian
Citizenship |
Other
Citizenship |
Immigrant
Pop. |
Non-Imm
Pop. |
Non
Permanent
Resident |
|
| Total Population |
84.3 |
15.7 |
38.0 |
59.4 |
2.6 |
| Vietnamese |
61.9 |
38.1 |
82.1 |
15.2 |
2.7 |
| Blacks |
71.1 |
28.9 |
63.3 |
30.6 |
6.5 |
| South Asians |
60.6 |
39.4 |
68.8 |
22.7 |
9.4 |
| Chinese |
64.3 |
35.7 |
74.0 |
21.2 |
5.0 |
| Koreans |
67.1 |
32.9 |
71.6 |
22.1 |
6.7 |
| Japanese |
81.2 |
18.2 |
19.2 |
71.2 |
10.6 |
| Filipinos |
60.8 |
39.2 |
69.6 |
20.1 |
11.5 |
| Southeast Asians |
62.0 |
38.0 |
80.3 |
16.8 |
3.0 |
| West Asians/Arabs |
54.4 |
45.6 |
66.9 |
21.5 |
13.2 |
| Latin Americans |
40.3 |
59.7 |
70.0 |
12.9 |
20.6 |
|
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile
of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social
Statistics Division, 1995.
AGE DISTRIBUTION
In terms of age distribution, both Vietnamese males and females
were disproportionately represented in the 0-14, and 25-44 age categories when compared to
the total population in the Toronto CMA (Tables 4.7 and 4.8). Vietnamese males and females
were particularly overrepresented in the 25-44 age category compared to other minority
groups and the population as a whole. In 1991, just under 50% of Vietnamese males, and 45%
of females were members of the 25-44 group. The figure for males was more than ten
percentage points higher than that observed among the total population of the CMA as a
whole. In addition, a greater percentage of Vietnamese males were represented in the 25-44
age category compared to any other minority group. The 45% of Vietnamese females who were
members of this same age category was almost ten percentage points higher than the figure
for the total female population of the CMA. Among other minority groups, only the Filipino
women had a higher proportion in this age category. Notably, Vietnamese men and women were
underrepresented in the older age categories of 45-64 and 65 and over. The Toronto figures
parallel those observed among the Vietnamese in the United States. American researchers
have reported that the Vietnamese population is considerably younger compared to the
immigrant and total
TABLE 4.6
GENDER DISTRIBUTION
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
|
Females |
Males |
Total |
%
Female |
%
Male |
| Total Population |
1,966,225 |
1,896,880 |
3,863,105 |
50.9 |
49.1 |
| Vietnamese |
10,030 |
11,930 |
21,960 |
45.7 |
54.3 |
| Blacks |
128,055 |
112,890 |
240,945 |
53.2 |
46.8 |
| South Asians |
114,470 |
120,950 |
235,420 |
48.6 |
51.4 |
| Chinese |
121,930 |
120,325 |
242,255 |
50.3 |
49.7 |
| Koreans |
11,315 |
10,785 |
22,100 |
51.2 |
48.8 |
| Japanese |
8,475 |
8,250 |
16,725 |
50.7 |
49.3 |
| Filipinos |
42,625 |
27,720 |
70,345 |
60.6 |
39.4 |
| Southeast Asians |
14,445 |
16,480 |
30,925 |
46.7 |
53.3 |
| West Asians/Arabs |
32,880 |
40,675 |
73,555 |
44.7 |
55.3 |
| Latin Americans |
22,050 |
21,765 |
43,815 |
50.3 |
49.7 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile
of Visible Minorities:
Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division,
1995.
TABLE 4.7
AGE DISTRIBUTION OF MALES
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Males, %
|
0-14
Years |
15-24
Years |
25-44
Years |
45-64
Years |
65+
Years |
| Total Population |
20.4 |
14.9 |
36.0 |
20.3 |
8.4 |
| Vietnamese |
25.5 |
17.6 |
48.5 |
5.8 |
2.8 |
| Blacks |
26.5 |
19.0 |
35.9 |
15.8 |
2.8 |
| South Asians |
24.3 |
15.4 |
39.7 |
16.8 |
3.8 |
| Chinese |
22.7 |
15.7 |
39.9 |
15.4 |
6.3 |
| Koreans |
21.8 |
22.8 |
27.1 |
23.7 |
4.6 |
| Japanese |
19.7 |
12.2 |
33.6 |
21.8 |
12.8 |
| Filipinos |
28.8 |
16.2 |
35.6 |
13.9 |
5.5 |
| Southeast Asians |
27.0 |
17.0 |
45.6 |
7.3 |
3.0 |
| West Asians/Arabs |
24.2 |
14.7 |
41.6 |
15.9 |
3.6 |
| Latin Americans |
24.6 |
18.8 |
42.5 |
12.2 |
2.0 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible
Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics
Division, 1995.
TABLE 4.8
AGE DISTRIBUTION OF FEMALES
VIETNAMESE AND VISIBLE MINORITY SUBGROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Females, %
|
0-14
Years |
15-24
Years |
25-44
Years |
45-64
Years |
65+
Years |
| Total Population |
18.7 |
14.0 |
36.2 |
20.1 |
11.1 |
| Vietnamese |
27.3 |
15.0 |
45.3 |
8.8 |
3.6 |
| Blacks |
22.6 |
17.7 |
37.7 |
17.2 |
4.9 |
| South Asians |
25.3 |
16.1 |
38.1 |
15.8 |
4.6 |
| Chinese |
20.0 |
14.1 |
41.6 |
16.1 |
8.4 |
| Koreans |
20.7 |
20.2 |
32.4 |
18.9 |
7.7 |
| Japanese |
18.0 |
11.3 |
34.1 |
22.4 |
14.1 |
| Filipinos |
16.9 |
12.6 |
49.1 |
15.4 |
6.0 |
| Southeast Asians |
26.9 |
15.4 |
43.7 |
10.0 |
4.1 |
| West Asians/Arabs |
27.8 |
14.4 |
37.1 |
15.0 |
5.7 |
| Latin Americans |
22.5 |
16.7 |
44.1 |
12.8 |
3.9 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of
1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada,
Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.
population of the United States (Rumbaut, 1995; Hung and Haines, 1996).
The skewed age distribution of the Vietnamese in both the U.S. and Canada reflects the
disproportionate representation of the younger adult cohorts in the refugee flow.
KNOWLEDGE OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES
Of the visible minority groups in the Toronto CMA, the Vietnamese
possessed the largest enumerated percentage speaking neither English or French
about 17% (Table 4.9). Without a doubt, this figure reflects the recency of arrival of
many Vietnamese compared to those individuals belonging to the other minority groups. Not
surprisingly, scholars in both the United States and Canada have found English language
ability among Vietnamese to be related to length of residence. In a longitudinal study of
Southeast Asian refugees resettled in Canada in 1981, Beiser and Johnson (1994) found a
stable increase over time in the ability of respondents to use English well and a steady
decline in the number of survey respondents who were not able to speak any English.
Historical and situational circumstances also may help explain some of
the dif-ferences among the groups on these variables. Members of many of the other
minority groups come from countries where the cultural impact of British, French, and
American colonialism was felt more strongly than in Vietnam. Despite the French
intervention in Vietnam, the share of the Vietnamese population in Toronto with knowledge
of French only or French and English was only slightly higher than that observed among
most of the other minority groups.
TABLE 4.9
KNOWLEDGE OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Knowledge of Official Languages %
|
English
Only |
French
Only |
Both French
And English |
Neither French
Nor English |
| Total Population |
88.2 |
.08 |
8.0 |
3.7 |
| Vietnamese |
77.3 |
.71 |
5.2 |
16.8 |
| Blacks |
94.7 |
.05 |
4.6 |
0.7 |
| South Asians |
90.5 |
.02 |
4.3 |
5.1 |
| Chinese |
80.5 |
.03 |
3.5 |
16.0 |
| Koreans |
83.7 |
.00 |
4.9 |
11.4 |
| Japanese |
89.4 |
.06 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
| Filipinos |
96.6 |
.03 |
2.3 |
1.0 |
| Southeast Asians |
79.1 |
.60 |
5.4 |
15.0 |
| West Asians/Arabs |
76.9 |
.67 |
15.9 |
6.6 |
| Latin Americans |
80.8 |
.02 |
5.0 |
14.1 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile
of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social
Statistics Division, 1995.
HIGHEST LEVEL OF SCHOOLING
In terms of highest level of schooling achieved, the Vietnamese
population in the Toronto CMA was overrepresented at the lower education levels in
comparison to the total population and other visible minority groups in 1991 (Table 4.10).
The proportion of the Vietnamese population 15 years and over with less than a grade 9
education was 21%, almost double the figure for the total population in the metropolitan
area. Of the other minority groups, only the Southeast Asian minority surpassed 20% on
this variable.
The largest component of the Vietnamese 15 and over population, almost
50% of the total, fell into the category of having earned a grade 9-13 education with or
without a secondary certificate. Again, no other minority group, with the exception of
Southeast Asians as a whole, approached the Vietnamese level in this particular
classification. Thus, almost 70% of the enumerated Vietnamese in Toronto fell into the two
lowest education categories.
In the university level categories of educational achievement, the
Vietnamese were very much underrepresented. According to the census, just under 40% the
entire CMA population had attended university with or without having earned a certificate
or degree. The Vietnamese proportion was 25%. Most of the other minority groups actually
possessed larger percentages of individuals with some university-level education compared
to the total population in the CMA as a whole.
TABLE 4.10
HIGHEST LEVEL OF SCHOOLING ACHIEVED
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Population 15 Years and Over,
Highest Level of Schooling Achieved, %1
|
Less Than Grade 9 |
Grades 9-13 |
Trades Certificate Or Diploma |
Other Non- University |
University Without Certificate Or Degree |
University With Certificate Or Degree |
| Total Population |
11.3 |
37.1 |
4.9 |
21.4 |
16.7 |
21.5 |
| Vietnamese |
20.7 |
47.6 |
1.3 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
11.5 |
| Blacks |
6.3 |
43.2 |
5.5 |
30.3 |
14.2 |
12.6 |
| South Asians |
10.1 |
38.0 |
2.1 |
20.6 |
17.0 |
23.6 |
| Chinese |
14.6 |
32.6 |
1.2 |
16.8 |
19.4 |
27.6 |
| Koreans |
6.3 |
35.7 |
0.8 |
8.8 |
35.9 |
34.2 |
| Japanese |
5.3 |
31.4 |
2.4 |
19.5 |
21.3 |
34.1 |
| Filipinos |
5.4 |
23.4 |
1.6 |
16.9 |
35.2 |
42.2 |
| Southeast Asians |
20.3 |
45.2 |
1.5 |
15.3 |
13.4 |
13.2 |
| West Asians/Arabs |
8.5 |
34.1 |
2.3 |
15.9 |
21.5 |
31.8 |
| Latin Americans |
13.1 |
38.9 |
2.5 |
18.7 |
24.0 |
18.9 |
1 Rows do not add up to 100%
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible
Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics
Division, 1995.
FERTILITY
In terms of birth rate, ever-married Vietnamese females 15 years
and over exhibited 2,363 children born per 1000 women (Table 4.11). This figure was
notably higher than the rate of 2,045 children born among the total population of women in
the Toronto metropolitan area. Vietnamese in the 15 years and over, ever-married category
also possessed higher birth rates compared to those apparent among several minority groups
including Chinese, Southeast Asians, West Asian/Arabs, Latin Americans, and especially
Japanese women. However, the birth rate among Vietnamese women in this category was
somewhat lower than that enumerated among Filipino, Black, South Asian, and Korean women.
Among ever-married women in the Toronto CMA, aged 15-44 years, the pattern was somewhat
similar. The Vietnamese birth rate of 1,686 children born per 1,000 women was higher than
the 1,499 average for the total population but the rate tallied among Vietnamese women in
this grouping was lower than that observed among several other minority groups including
Blacks, Latin Americans, Koreans, West Asians/Arabs, and Southeast Asians as a whole.
South Asians, Filipinos, Chinese, and Japanese women possessed lower birth rates than
Vietnamese women in this particular category. Finally, among single women, 15 years and
over, the Vietnamese birth rate of 194 children born per 1,000 women was notably higher
than the average of 136 exhibited by the total population in the Toronto metropolitan
area. Within the category of single women, most of the other groups including South
Asians, Filipinos, West Asians/Arabs, Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese possessed birth rates
lower than that observed among the total population within the Toronto CMA. It should be
noted that researchers in the U.S. have similarly observed that Vietnamese women tend to
have more children than the American average. (Haines, 1996; Rumbaut, 1989a; Rumbaut
1989b).
TABLE 4.11
BIRTH RATE
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Children Ever-Born Per 1000 Women
|
Ever-Married Women, 15 Years and Over |
Ever-Married Women, 15-44 Years |
Single Women, 15 Years and Over |
| Total Population |
2045 |
1499 |
136 |
| Vietnamese |
2363 |
1686 |
194 |
| Blacks |
2422 |
1829 |
620 |
| South Asians |
2414 |
1668 |
80 |
| Chinese |
2286 |
1416 |
37 |
| Koreans |
2391 |
1783 |
34 |
| Japanese |
1790 |
1147 |
13 |
| Filipinos |
2488 |
1589 |
73 |
| Southeast Asians |
2347 |
1721 |
189 |
| West Asians/Arabs |
2193 |
1736 |
51 |
| Latin Americans |
2283 |
1803 |
380 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible
Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics
Division, 1995.
RELIGION
In Table 4.12, the religious affiliation of the Vietnamese
population is compared to the total population of the Toronto CMA. In contrast to the
entire population of the metropolitan area, the largest proportion of the Vietnamese
counted in Toronto in 1991 were Buddhists. The enumerated figure of about 43% was notably
lower, however, compared to standard estimates for the population of Vietnam. The
proportion of Vietnams population which is Buddhist is usually estimated to be in
the 70-80% range (Thien-An 1975, McClellan 1993). On the other hand, 20% of the enumerated
Vietnamese population were Catholics, compared to 36% of the CMA population as a whole.
The share of Vietnamese who were Catholics in the Toronto metropolitan area was about
double the standard estimate among the population in Vietnam. Certain scholars have noted
that a disproportionate share of the Vietnamese who came to the United States as refugees
were Catholics. A larger proportion of Catholics left Vietnam as refugees as a result of
particularly severe persecution directed towards Catholics in South Vietnam after the fall
of Saigon (Rutledge, 1985). About 4% of the Vietnamese enumerated in the Toronto area were
Protestants, compared to almost 35% of the entire population in the metropolitan area.
This compares favourably to the less than 1% of the
TABLE 4.12
RELIGIOUS FAITH
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Religious Affiliation, %
Orthodox Affiliation
|
Catholic |
Protestant |
Jewish |
Eastern
Orthodox |
Buddhist |
Islam |
Hindu |
Sikh |
No Affiliation |
Total Population |
35.8 |
34.9 |
3.9 |
3.2 |
1.3 |
2.7 |
2.33 |
1.1 |
14.6 |
| Vietnamese |
19.8 |
4.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
43.4 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
31.8 |
Source: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991
total population in Vietnam estimated to belong to Protestant
denominations. Although it is not shown in the table, it is also notable that the census
data indicated that most Vietnamese Protestants in Toronto belonged to the
"other" Protestant category. Few are members of the United and Anglican
churches, the largest denominations among the total population. Interviews with several
research informants including Vietnamese clergymen suggest that the majority of the
Vietnamese Protestants in Toronto probably belong to the evangelical Christian Missionary
Alliance denomination.
It should also be pointed out that the proportion of the Vietnamese
population who told the census takers they were Buddhists may not reflect the actual
number of Vietnamese adherents of this particular religion. Around 32% of the Vietnamese
population claimed to have no religious affiliation in contrast to about 15% for the
population of Toronto CMA as a whole. This number contrasts sharply with standard
estimates for the population of Vietnam. Most scholars of Vietnam culture claim upwards of
90% of Vietnams population possess some form of religious attachment, whether it be
Catholicism, Cao Daism, Protestantism, Islam, or some form of Buddhism, Confucianism, and
ancestor worship (Hickey 1964). It seems likely that many Vietnamese Buddhists selected
the "No affiliation" category when answering the census. The minority status of
the Buddhist religion likely serves to deter public identification with this religion in a
Canadian context. In addition, it should be observed that the census form did not include
response space for some of the other religions commonly practiced by Vietnamese including
Cao Daism and forms of Confucianism as well as ancestor worship. It is anyones guess
how Vietnamese respondents who practise these religions chose to fill out their census
forms. It seems plausible that these persons may have variably chosen the
"Buddhist", "No Affiliation", or "Other Religion" responses.
SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
In 1996, over 130,000 persons of Vietnamese ethnic origin were
enumerated in all of Canada. About ¼ of the total Vietnamese population counted in Canada
lived in the Toronto metropolitan area. Among Canadian cities, only the population in
Montreal approached the Toronto figure. Demographically, the Vietnamese aggregate differed
at least somewhat from the total population and other minority groups in the Toronto CMA
in terms of the share it registered on most variables. The demographic profile of the
Toronto Vietnamese in part reflects the relative recency of the arrival of this
population. In addition, the circumstances of the Vietnamese arrival shape the demography
of this group. Most Vietnamese residing in Toronto came to Canada as refugees or were
sponsored by family members. Few arrived as independent immigrants. In this regard,
Vietnamese differ significantly from most of the other predominantly immigrant minority
groups.
Period of arrival figures clearly demonstrate the relatively short
period of time most Vietnamese have resided in Canada compared to the overall population
and most of the other minority groups residing in the Toronto area. While over 80% of the
enumerated Vietnamese in Toronto were immigrants the highest proportion of any of
the minority groups more than 60% of Vietnamese already possessed Canadian
citizenship as of 1991. The share of Vietnamese with Canadian citizenship was in fact
comparable to several other predominantly immigrant minority groups including Koreans,
Filipinos, Chinese, and South Asians. The Vietnamese figures are impressive given the
relative recency of the arrival of this population compared to these other groups
many of whose members began arriving in large numbers in decades prior to the 1980s. High
rates of citizenship among an immigrant population are one measure of integration with the
larger Canadian society.
The refugee status of many Vietnamese who came to Canada most likely
also has influenced the gender, age, language fluency, and educational profiles of the
population in Toronto. While the total population and most other minority groups exhibit a
majority of women as opposed to men, the situation among the Vietnamese was just the
opposite. The disproportionate share of men within the Vietnamese population reflects the
fact that young single male adults were the persons most likely to escape from Vietnam as
refugees throughout the late 1970s and 1980s. The sizable refugee component of the
population also strongly skews the age profile. The younger age groups were very much
overrepresented among persons of Vietnamese ethnic origin. In 1991, the Vietnamese
possessed a far greater representation in the 25-44 age category compared to the total
population and all of the other minority groups. Conversely, the Vietnamese displayed a
significant underrepresentation in the 45-64 and 65 and over age categories. Many
Vietnamese persons in these age groups were too frail to attempt to leave the country as
refugees. It also seems logical that the overrepresentation of Vietnamese in the 0-14 age
category relative to both the total population and several of the other minority groups
could be at least somewhat attributed to the sizable cohort of Vietnamese females within
the 25-44 age category the prime childbearing years.
The relative recency of arrival associated with most of the population
has probably contributed to the significant share of Vietnamese who cannot speak either
English or French. The Vietnamese proportion was higher than that exhibited by any of the
other major minority groups included in the census figures. The relatively large share of
Vietnamese who did not possess knowledge of either of the official languages was also
likely influenced by the fact that most Vietnamese came to Canada as refugees or as
family-sponsored as opposed to independent immigrants. Ability in English or French is not
as influential in the admission criteria for persons coming seeking to come to Canada in
the refugee or family sponsorship categories. Vietnamese as an aggregate were also
overrepresented in the categories of lesser educational achievement, again at least
somewhat reflecting the disproportionate number of Vietnamese who arrived as refugees or
family-sponsored immigrants compared to several of the other primarily immigrant minority
groups.
Finally, 1991 census data show that the largest number of Vietnamese in
Toronto were Buddhists. However the Buddhist proportion of the enumerated Toronto
Vietnamese population was much lower than commonly estimated for the entire population of
Vietnam. About 1/5 of the enumerated Vietnamese possessed a Catholic affiliation and four
percent were Protestants. Almost 1/3 of the population did not claim a religious
affiliation. This figure likely included many Buddhists who chose the
"no-affiliation" category given the minority status and low visibility of
Buddhism within Canada. Indeed, less than 1% of the entire population in the Toronto
Metropolitan Area claimed a Buddhist affiliation in 1991.
To
Chapter 5
Abstract/Acknowledgements/Table
of Contents - [ Chapters - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 ] - Appendices - References
Cited
Back
to Top
|