"Community",
Adaptation and the Vietnamese in Toronto |
By Mark Edward Pfeifer
Ó Copyright by Mark Edward Pfeifer
(1999)
Abstract/Acknowledgements/Table
of Contents - [ Chapters - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 ] - Appendices - References
Cited
PART III
RELATIONSHIPS OF THE VIETNAMESE WITH
THE HOST SOCIETY IN TORONTO
CHAPTER NINE
VIETNAMESE INCORPORATION IN THE
MAINSTREAM TORONTO ECONOMY
INTRODUCTION
Scholars have attempted to account for the differential status
attainment and social mobility of immigrant groups over time. Following the logic of the
assimilation model, research has indicated that to some extent, differences in
socioeconomic attainment (occupational status and income) may be related to the human
capital characteristics associated with the individuals who compose particular groups.
Examples of such human capital variables include parental background, education, and
occupational training, work background, as well as English proficiency and duration of
residence in the host society (Hirschmann 1982; Morawska, 1990; Hiebert, 1993). However,
even after all of these variables are held constant in empirical analyses, scholars have
observed significant differences in socioeconomic attainment among different groups,
supporting the hypothesis that factors beyond personal human capital affect mobility.
Social scientific explanations for the differential socioeconomic status of immigrant
minority groups as opposed to the dominant majority population have centered upon the
influence of a sectoral segmentation of labour. Scholars have emphasized that regardless
of the human capital characteristics possessed by individuals belonging to certain
minority groups, a differential insertion into the labour market inhibits access to equal
opportunities and negatively influences occupational status and earnings (Li, 1990;
Satzewich, 1991)
A perspective commonly referred to as dual labour market theory has
been applied to the situation of immigrants. Researchers have observed that many immigrant
minority groups residing in the United States and Canada are situated within distinct
segments of the larger labour market compared to the majority population. A plethora of
studies have indicated that many immigrant minorities are significantly underrepresented
in the `primary tier of occupations, which include the professions and jobs in large
corporations. The primary jobs are usually associated with greater skill requirements
and/or a high level of unionization. Persons working in the primary sector generally
possess higher wages and experience upward mobility in relation to education and years on
the job. These positions also tend to be relatively secure when the economy is in
recession. Conversely, members of many immigrant and `racial minority groups tend to
be over-concentrated in the so-called `secondary component of the economy. Employees
in the secondary sector usually receive little return for prior experience or education as
the information needed to do their jobs is assumed by their employers to be acquired
quickly. Employment in the secondary tier is often unskilled, repetitive or monotonous in
nature and is associated with low renumeration, a lack of meaningful benefits, and an
unstable and often quite limited duration. These jobs are often associated with less
pleasant working conditions and often do not provide much opportunity for worker mobility
or advancement. Jobs in the secondary sector include positions in manufacturing, the
service industries, and retail (Morawska, 1990; Heisler, 1992; Hiebert, 1993; Yamanaka and
McClelland, 1994).
Scholars have also devoted much recent attention to ethnic economic
enclaves subeconomies consisting of immigrant-owned businesses employing co-ethnic
labourers (Alba and Nee, 1997; Portes and Zhou, 1996). Many of the jobs in the ethnic
economy also belong to the "informal" sector of the labour market. While the
working conditions associated with enclave jobs may be exploitative, with wages at or
below the minimum wage, these jobs also commonly involve relatively flexible arrangements
between worker and employer with earnings paid "under the table". Working in
co-ethnic firms also may provide employees with entrepreneurial experience and networks of
capital and other resources they may call upon when setting up businesses of their own
(Gold, 1992; Gold; 1994). Portes and his colleagues argue that members of certain
immigrant groups have utilized the ethnic enclave as a strategy to overcome discrimination
and institutional barriers in the labour market of the host society and achieve
socioeconomic mobility (Portes and Manning, 1986; Portes and Zhou, 1996).
This chapter will investigate the experiences of the Vietnamese ethnic
origin population in the mainstream Toronto economy. The following interrelated research
questions will guide the analysis: How did the Vietnamese ethnic origin population
enumerated in 1991 compare to the total population of the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area
(CMA) as well other major "visible"minority groups in terms of its
representation on a range of socioeconomic variables including occupational and income
distribution, income composition, unemployment, and rates of self-employment? What are
some of the factors which might help account for the labour market incorporation of the
Vietnamese ethnic origin population? What are some of the other strategies
Vietnamese-Canadians have used to achieve subsistence as well as advance socioeconomically
in addition to employment in the mainstream Toronto labour market?
The first portion of the chapter will analyze the distribution of
this population on a range of socioeconomic variables drawn from the 1991 census. Where
possible, the data is broken down by gender. Throughout the analysis, the Vietnamese
distributions on all of these variables will be assessed in relation to those exhibited by
the entire population of the Toronto CMA and other significant minority populations
including Black, South Asian, West Asian/Arab, and Southeast Asian ethnic groups as well
as Chinese, Filipinos, Koreans and Japanese. In the latter portion of the chapter, the
socioeconomic profile of the enumerated Vietnamese population will be discussed within the
context of the work of other scholars who have studied the economic adaptation of persons
of Vietnamese origin and other minority groups in both Canada and the United States.
OCCUPATIONAL DISTRIBUTION BY GENDER
The analysis of census data begins with a look at the occupational
distribution of Vietnamese men and women enumerated in 1991 relative to the total labour
force in the Toronto CMA. The most notable finding is the rather remarkable concentration
of Vietnamese males in machining, product fabricating, assembly and repair positions
(Table 9.1). Well over 1/3 of Vietnamese men were employed in these manufacturing jobs in
comparison to around 10% of the entire male labour force. Within this larger category,
over 90% of Vietnamese men worked in product fabricating, assembly, and repair as opposed
to machining occupations. Conversely, Vietnamese men were very much underrepresented in
managerial, administrative, and related occupations compared to the total labour force.
The Vietnamese proportion in these jobs was only about a quarter of that exhibited by the
entire male labour force in Toronto. Furthermore, the percentage of Vietnamese men working
in sales positions was less than half of the 10% of the total male labour force possessing
occupations in this sector. Vietnamese men were somewhat underrepresented in most of the
other major job classifications as well including teaching and related occupations, health
and medicine, natural and social sciences, religious, art and related occupations,
clerical work, sales positions, services, construction trades, and transport equipment
operating jobs.
TABLE 9.1
OCCUPATIONAL DISTRIBUTION, MALES AND FEMALES
VIETNAMESE AND TOTAL LABOUR FORCE
TORONTO CMA, 1991
|
Vietnamese |
Total Labour Force |
|
%
Men |
%
Women |
%
Men |
%
Women |
|
| Managerial, Administrative, and Related
Occupations |
4.7 |
6.0 |
18.4 |
14.2 |
| Teaching and Related Occupations |
1.0 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
5.8 |
| Health and Medicine |
1.7 |
5.2 |
1.8 |
6.8 |
| Natural and Social Sciences, Religious,
Art, and Related Occupations |
8.1 |
5.6 |
12.0 |
8.0 |
| Clerical |
7.6 |
22.3 |
10.3 |
34.0 |
| Sales |
4.5 |
6.4 |
10.1 |
9.5 |
| Services |
7.6 |
9.8 |
9.5 |
11.2 |
| Primary |
0.6 |
0.4 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
| Processing |
5.2 |
2.6 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
| Machining, Product Fabricating, Assembly
and Repair |
35.7 |
27.4 |
11.3 |
4.3 |
| Construction Trades |
6.7 |
0.8 |
8.5 |
0.4 |
| Transport Equipment Operating |
2.0 |
0.4 |
4.9 |
0.7 |
| Other |
14.5 |
11.0 |
7.3 |
3.5 |
Sources: Statistics Canada,
Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa:
Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.
Assessing the occupational distribution of Vietnamese women
enumerated in 1991, a similar overrepresentation in manufacturing positions is evident
(Table 9.1). Almost 30% of Vietnamese women worked in machining, product fabricating,
assembly and repair jobs while less then 5% of the total female labour force held
positions in this category. Within this larger classification of jobs, most Vietnamese
worked in product fabricating, assembly and repair as opposed to machining. Also like
their male counterparts, Vietnamese women displayed greater proportions in
"Other" jobs not classified on the census form as well as processing positions.
Over 20% of Vietnamese women worked in clerical jobs, but this figure was more than 10
percentage points lower than that associated with the total female labour force.
Vietnamese women were notably underrepresented in managerial, administrative and related
occupations, teaching and related occupations, sales, and to a lesser extent health and
medicine and services.
INDUSTRY DIVISIONS
In terms of industry distribution, the Vietnamese in the Toronto
CMA displayed a remarkable concentration within manufacturing compared to all other groups
in 1991. About 44% of the total enumerated Vietnamese labour force were employed in
manufacturing (Tables 9.2 and 9.3).With the exception of Southeast Asians as a whole, no
other group was nearly so concentrated in this particular industrial category.
TABLE 9.2
LABOUR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, MALES AND FEMALES
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Labour Force 15 Years and Over by Industry, %1
|
|
|
|
All Services |
|
|
Manu-
Fact. |
Con-
Util. |
Trade |
Fin. |
Bus. |
Govt. |
Edu. |
Health |
Accom. |
Industries
n
(in 1000) |
|
Total Labour |
17.3 |
13.5 |
18.0 |
9.0 |
9.4 |
5.5 |
6.2 |
7.2 |
5.7 |
2,381 |
| Vietnamese |
43.8 |
8.3 |
16.5 |
4.2 |
5.1 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
4.5 |
6.2 |
10 |
Blacks |
18.2 |
11.6 |
16.8 |
8.7 |
7.6 |
5.9 |
3.3 |
12.5 |
7.6 |
146 |
SouthAsians |
26.0 |
9.4 |
18.9 |
10.4 |
9.5 |
4.7 |
3.3 |
5.8 |
6.2 |
138 |
Chinese |
19.9 |
7.4 |
17.9 |
12.6 |
10.9 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
6.3 |
11.4 |
137 |
Koreans |
8.8 |
4.6 |
41.7 |
5.4 |
6.2 |
2.5 |
3.1 |
5.2 |
11.8 |
13 |
Japanese |
14.3 |
9.5 |
21.4 |
7.4 |
13.2 |
5.4 |
7.4 |
6.6 |
5.9 |
10 |
Filipinos |
15.5 |
6.4 |
12.5 |
11.1 |
6.7 |
4.2 |
2.1 |
16.8 |
6.5 |
48 |
Southeast Asians |
42.9 |
7.7 |
15.5 |
4.3 |
5.4 |
2.6 |
2.5 |
5.2 |
6.5 |
16 |
West Asians |
15.5 |
12.6 |
24.5 |
7.6 |
9.5 |
3.4 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
9.6 |
39 |
Latin Americans |
25.9 |
12.4 |
17.1 |
6.4 |
6.0 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
5.4 |
9.4 |
25 |
1 Percentages for employment in
"Primary Industries" and "Service Industries" are excluded due to very
low percentages.
Full Labels of column headings: Manufact. = Manufacturing; Con-Util =
Construction, Transportation, Communication, and other Utilities, Fin.= Finance,
Insurance, and Real Estate; Bus. = Business Services; Govt. = Government Services; Edu. =
Education Services; Health = Health and Social Services; Accom. = Accomodation, Food and
Beverage Services
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible
Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics
Division, 1995.
As for jobs in the broad categories of construction,
transportation, communications and other utilities, the Vietnamese proportion was a bit
lower than the average for the total CMA labour force but did not differ substantially
from most of the other visible minority groups. About 16% of the Vietnamese were employed
in the industrial classification of trade, which was very close to the 18% average for the
entire labour force. Among the other minority groups, the Koreans were by far the most
heavily concentrated in trade. The Vietnamese were notably underrepresented compared to
the total Toronto CMA labour force and other minority groups in several industrial
categories. Occupations in which Vietnamese were not well represented included positions
in several professional sectors, among these were Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate,
Business Services, Government Services, Education Services, and Health and Social
Services. The enumerated Vietnamese labour force showed a slightly higher proportion than
the entire Toronto labour force in the category of accommodation, food, and beverage
services. However, the Chinese and Korean shares in this industrial classification were
nearly double the Vietnamese figure. In terms of employment in the broad category of other
service industries, the Vietnamese percentage was marginally lower than the figure for the
total Toronto labour force. Koreans, Latin Americans, and especially Filipinos were
overrepresented in the service occupations.
INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTION AND GENDER
Unfortunately, directly comparable industry distribution data
organized by gender was not available for both the Vietnamese ethnic origin population and
the other visible minority groups. In this section, the distributions of males and females
are analyzed by using Southeast Asians as a surrogate variable. As noted in an earlier
chapter, about 70% of the Southeast Asians enumerated in the census in 1991 were of
Vietnamese ethnic origin. On almost every variable in the census, the Southeast Asian
figure was very close to that of the Vietnamese.
Among the male labour force in the Toronto CMA, Southeast Asians were
overwhelmingly concentrated in manufacturing industries in 1991 (Table 9.4). The Southeast
Asian figure of nearly 50% was more than double that observed among the total male work
force of the metropolitan area. No other minority group showed more than 30% of its male
labour force in manufacturing. Southeast Asians in the Toronto CMA were underrepresented
in construction, transportation, communication, and other utilities. Southeast Asian males
were slightly underrepresented in trade in comparison to the total male population. By
comparison, Korean men were very much overrepresented in this category. Highly notable
were the miniscule proportions of the Southeast Asian male labour force found in the
occupations of finance, insurance, and real estate, business services, government
services, education services, and health and social services. Within these economic
sectors, Southeast Asian men exhibited proportions below most of the other minority
groups. In accommodation, food, and beverage services, the Southeast Asian male percentage
was parallel to that of the total male labour force of the CMA. All of the other minority
groups with the exception of the Japanese exhibited larger proportions within this
category. In the other services classification, Southeast Asian males displayed a slightly
lower proportion than the male labour force as a whole. A few groups, notably Japanese,
Latin Americans, and especially Koreans, possessed greater proportions in these
occupations compared to the overall CMA average for men.
TABLE 9.4
LABOUR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, MALES
SOUTHEAST ASIANS AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Labour Force 15 Years and Over by Industry, %1
|
|
|
|
All Services |
|
|
Manu-
Fact. |
Con-
Util. |
Trade |
Fin. |
Bus. |
Govt. |
Edu. |
Health |
Accom. |
Industries
n
(in 1000) |
|
Total Labour Force |
20.6 |
19.5 |
18.1 |
7.0 |
9.4 |
5.5 |
4.2 |
2.8 |
5.5 |
1,255 |
Blacks |
24.1 |
18.1 |
18.7 |
5.6 |
7.7 |
5.7 |
2.6 |
3.2 |
7.7 |
69 |
South Asians |
28.9 |
12.5 |
18.8 |
7.5 |
10.2 |
4.4 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
7.1 |
78 |
Chinese |
20.6 |
10.1 |
18.5 |
9.8 |
11.6 |
3.6 |
3.2 |
3.6 |
14.0 |
72 |
Koreans |
9.7 |
6.9 |
42.5 |
4.6 |
6.4 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
10.2 |
6 |
Japanese |
17.6 |
13.0 |
23.0 |
6.0 |
13.9 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
5.6 |
5 |
Filipinos |
26.8 |
11.0 |
15.4 |
9.9 |
7.6 |
4.1 |
2.1 |
8.4 |
8.9 |
17 |
Southeast Asians |
47.5 |
10.5 |
15.1 |
2.9 |
4.9 |
2.7 |
1.9 |
2.6 |
6.1 |
9 |
West Asians |
17.7 |
17.1 |
24.5 |
5.9 |
9.3 |
2.9 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
10.7 |
25 |
Latin Americans |
29.0 |
18.8 |
16.4 |
4.6 |
6.3 |
2.6 |
2.1 |
2.5 |
9.2 |
13 |
1 Percentages for employment in
"Primary Industries" and "Service Industries" are excluded due to very
low percentages.
Full Labels of column headings: Manufact. = Manufacturing; Con-Util =
Construction, Transportation,
Communication, and other Utilities, Fin.= Finance, Insurance, and Real
Estate; Bus. = Business Services; Govt. = Government Services; Edu. = Education Services;
Health = Health and Social Services; Accom. = Accomodation, Food and Beverage Services
Source: Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa:
Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.
TABLE 9.5
LABOUR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, FEMALES
SOUTHEAST ASIANS AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Labour Force by Industry, %1
|
|
|
|
All Services |
|
|
Manu-
Fact. |
Con-
Util. |
Trade |
Fin. |
Bus. |
Govt. |
Edu. |
Health |
Accom. |
Industries
n
(in 1000) |
|
Total Labour Force |
13.6 |
6.7 |
17.9 |
11.2 |
9.5 |
5.5 |
8.4 |
12.1 |
5.8 |
1125 |
Blacks |
12.8 |
5.7 |
15.0 |
11.6 |
7.6 |
6.0 |
3.9 |
20.9 |
7.8 |
76 |
South Asians |
22.3 |
5.4 |
19.0 |
14.1 |
8.6 |
5.1 |
4.1 |
9.6 |
5.0 |
60 |
Chinese |
19.1 |
4.4 |
17.2 |
15.6 |
10.1 |
4.2 |
5.3 |
9.4 |
8.6 |
65 |
Koreans |
7.8 |
2.3 |
40.6 |
6.3 |
6.0 |
1.9 |
3.3 |
7.7 |
13.5 |
6 |
Japanese |
10.5 |
5.3 |
19.5 |
9.1 |
12.4 |
6.6 |
10.8 |
9.2 |
6.3 |
4 |
Filipinos |
9.2 |
3.8 |
10.9 |
11.6 |
6.2 |
4.2 |
2.1 |
21.4 |
5.2 |
30 |
Southeast Asians |
36.4 |
3.6 |
15.9 |
6.3 |
6.1 |
2.4 |
3.4 |
8.8 |
7.1 |
6 |
West Asians |
11.6 |
4.4 |
24.5 |
10.6 |
9.9 |
4.4 |
8.8 |
8.6 |
7.7 |
14 |
Latin Americans |
22.3 |
5.0 |
17.9 |
8.5 |
5.8 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
8.8 |
9.6 |
11 |
1 Percentages for employment in "Primary
Industries" and "Service Industries" are excluded due to very low
percentages.
Full Labels of column headings: Manufact. = Manufacturing; Con-Util =
Construction, Transportation,
Communication, and other Utilities, Fin.= Finance, Insurance, and Real
Estate; Bus. = Business Services; Govt. = Government Services; Edu. = Education Services;
Health = Health and Social Services; Accom. = Accomodation, Food and Beverage Services
Source: Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa:
Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.
Among the female labour force in the Toronto CMA, Southeast Asian women
were also overrepresented in manufacturing (Table 9.5). The share of Southeast Asian women
enumerated in manufacturing jobs was nearly triple the figure for the entire female labour
force in the metropolitan area. No other minority group was nearly as well represented in
manufacturing occupations. Southeast Asian women were less likely to work in the
construction, transportation, communications, and other utilities occupations compared to
the female labour force as a whole. Southeast Asian women were also somewhat
underrepresented in trade-oriented jobs compared to the total female labour force. Similar
to their male counterparts, Korean women were highly concentrated in trade, much more so
than any of the other minority groups. Like Southeast Asian men, Southeast Asian women
were significantly underrepresented in the professional sectors of finance, insurance, and
real estate, business services, government services, and education services. Southeast
Asian women were also somewhat less likely to work in health and social services compared
to the Toronto female labour force. By contrast, a few minority groups, notably Black and
Filipino women, were especially well represented in this category. Southeast Asian women
were slightly more likely to work in the accommodations, food, and beverage service jobs
in comparison to the entire Toronto female labour force. In other services occupations,
Southeast Asian women showed about the same proportion as the total female labour force
but less than several other minority groups.
INCOME
Stunning differences in income distinquished Vietnamese men from
the total male population and most of the other minority groups in 1991 (Table 9.6). The
average employment income of Vietnamese men who worked full-time was just $28,047. This
figure was only about 63% of the average income for the entire male population who worked
full-time in the CMA. The average income for Vietnamese men employed full-time was in fact
the lowest of all of the visible minority groups. Only two of the other minority
populations Southeast Asians as a whole, and Latin Americans were below
$30,000 on this variable. The average employment income for Vietnamese men in the Toronto
CMA who worked part-time was just $13,387. Again, this figure was the lowest of all of the
minority groups. It was about 2/3 of the average employment income observed among the
total male population in the metropolitan area who worked part-time.
The average employment income among Vietnamese women was $22,181 (Table
9.6). This figure was about 75% of the average for the entire full-time female workforce
in the metropolitan area. The average employment income for Vietnamese women who worked
full-time was lower than that of all of the other minority groups with the exception of
Latin Americans. The average employment income of Vietnamese females who worked part-time
was $11,847. This number was a little bit more than 85% of the average for the total
population of female part-time workers. The average employment income for Vietnamese
females who worked part-time did not differ much from that of several of the other
minority groups. South Asian, Korean, Southeast Asian, and Latin American women actually
displayed slightly lower figures. In general, it may be stated that most women who worked
part-time experience very low incomes, in comparison to men who were employed less than
full-time.
TABLE 9.6
INCOME, MALES AND FEMALES, 15 YEARS AND OVER
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Average Employment Income, $
|
Males
Worked
Full Year
Full Time |
Females
Worked
Full Year
Full Time |
Males
Worked
Part Year
Part Time |
Females
Worked
Part Year
Part Time |
|
Total Population |
44,497 |
29,830 |
20,232 |
13,728 |
Vietnamese |
28,047 |
22,181 |
13,387 |
11,847 |
Blacks |
32,393 |
25,193 |
15,494 |
12,907 |
South Asians |
33,972 |
24,925 |
16,067 |
11,733 |
Chinese |
37,345 |
27,677 |
16,045 |
12,941 |
Koreans |
33,807 |
24,146 |
14,527 |
11,178 |
Japanese |
53,039 |
33,044 |
24,479 |
14,591 |
Filipinos |
33,565 |
24,244 |
16,048 |
13,639 |
Southeast Asians |
28,787 |
22,305 |
13,840 |
11,619 |
West Asians/Arabs |
37,153 |
27,530 |
17,251 |
12,196 |
Latin Americans |
29,078 |
21,555 |
15,504 |
10,929 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of
1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada,
Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.
TABLE 9.7
AVERAGE AND MEDIAN INCOME, MALES AND FEMALES
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Average and Median Income,
Males and Females 15 Years and Over, $
|
Average
Income
Males |
Average
Income
Females |
Median
Income
Males |
Median
Income
Females |
|
Total Population |
35,779 |
21,855 |
29,558 |
18,550 |
Vietnamese |
20,885 |
15,282 |
20,315 |
13,518 |
Blacks |
24,937 |
18,794 |
23,107 |
17,543 |
South Asians |
26,865 |
17,687 |
23,525 |
15,909 |
Chinese |
27,794 |
19,134 |
23,076 |
15,951 |
Koreans |
24,833 |
16,747 |
18,250 |
12,931 |
Japanese |
43,026 |
24,418 |
34,051 |
20,962 |
Filipinos |
25,726 |
19,407 |
25,213 |
17,186 |
Southeast Asians |
21,984 |
16,017 |
20,860 |
14,188 |
West Asians/Arabs |
27,474 |
17,717 |
21,492 |
13,872 |
Latin Americans |
22,577 |
15,106 |
20,717 |
13,219 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of
1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada,
Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.
Examining the average and median income of Vietnamese men and women 15
years and over (Table 9.7), similar patterns were evident. The average income of
enumerated Vietnamese males 15 years and over in the Toronto CMA was $20,855 in 1991.
Again, this figure was the lowest of all of the minority groups. The average income of
Vietnamese males was just 58% of that for the entire male population in the metropolitan
area. In terms of median income for men 15 years and over, the Vietnamese figure was
$20,315. This was just below 70% of the median income for the total male population in
Toronto. Of the other minority groups, only Korean men had a lower median income. The
average income of enumerated Vietnamese females 15 years and over was $15,282. This was
about 70% of the average income for the entire female population of the CMA. Among the
other minority groups, only Latin American women had a lower average income. The median
income of enumerated Vietnamese females was $13,815. This figure was about ¾ of that for
the entire female population in the metropolitan area. Of the other groups, Latin American
and Korean women had lower median incomes.
Assessing all of the income figures, it may be summarized that both
Vietnamese men and women experienced very low incomes in comparison to the total
population in Toronto. Regardless of full or part-time status or gender, Vietnamese
incomes were consistently among the lowest of the groups defined by Statistics Canada as
visible minorities. It should be noted, however, that the disparities between the incomes
of Vietnamese females and the total female population, while noteworthy, were not as great
as those apparent between Vietnamese men and the entire male population of the
metropolitan area. This situation is reflective of the fact that the incomes of all women
were already much lower compared to those earned by men. Indeed, the average employment
income of the total female full-time workforce in the Toronto CMA in 1991 was only about
2/3 of the average for the full-time male workforce.
COMPOSITION OF TOTAL INCOME
Assessing the composition of total income for both men and women
combined, Vietnamese in the Toronto CMA derived 86% of their income from employment in
1991, compared to 82% for the total population (Table 9.8). Notable differences were
apparent in terms of the proportion of income derived from government transfer payments.
The enumerated Vietnamese received 12.5% of their earnings from transfer payments compared
to 7.5% for the total population. No other minority group derived as large a a proportion
of its income from transfers as the Vietnamese. Among the other minority groups, only the
Southeast Asians as a whole and Latin Americans received more than 10% of their income
from transfers.
Unfortunately, breakdowns of the total income composition in terms of
gender were not available for the Vietnamese ethnic origin population. However, it is
possible to again use Southeast Asians as a surrogate and compare this group (of which
Vietnamese were slightly more than 2/3) to the entire population and the other minority
groups. Among males, Southeast Asians did not differ much from the total population in
terms of the proportion of total income which was derived from employment (Table 9.9).
Differences were apparent however in the proportion of income received from government
transfer payments. The average for the total male population in the CMA was about 6%. In
comparison, Southeast Asian men derived about 10% of their total income from transfers.
Among the other minority groups, only Latin American men matched this figure.
TABLE 9.8
COMPOSITION OF TOTAL INCOME
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Composition of Total Income, %
|
Employment
Income |
Government
Transfer Payments |
Other
Income |
|
Total Population |
82.1 |
7.5 |
10.5 |
Vietnamese |
86.3 |
12.5 |
1.2 |
Blacks |
87.9 |
8.6 |
3.5 |
SouthAsians |
89.0 |
6.9 |
4.1 |
Chinese |
84.8 |
6.3 |
9.0 |
Koreans |
85.4 |
7.8 |
6.8 |
Japanese |
80.9 |
6.6 |
12.5 |
Filipinos |
91.7 |
5.7 |
2.6 |
Southeast Asians |
85.3 |
11.4 |
3.3 |
West Asians/Arabs |
84.7 |
9.0 |
6.4 |
Latin Americans |
85.2 |
11.8 |
3.1 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of
1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada,
Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.
TABLE 9.9
COMPOSITION OF TOTAL INCOME, MALES AND FEMALES
SOUTHEAST ASIAN AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Composition of Total Income, %
|
Employment Income |
Government Transfer |
Other Income |
|
Men |
Women |
Men |
Women |
Men |
Women |
|
Total Population |
84.9 |
77.5 |
5.9 |
10.0 |
9.2 |
12.6 |
Blacks |
90.1 |
85.5 |
6.6 |
10.8 |
3.3 |
3.7 |
SouthAsians |
90.1 |
86.9 |
6.0 |
8.5 |
3.9 |
4.6 |
Chinese |
87.1 |
81.3 |
5.2 |
7.8 |
7.7 |
10.9 |
Koreans |
87.7 |
82.1 |
6.3 |
10.1 |
6.0 |
7.8 |
Japanese |
84.6 |
74.1 |
5.0 |
9.5 |
10.4 |
16.4 |
Filipinos |
92.3 |
91.2 |
5.6 |
5.8 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
Southeast Asians |
87.9 |
80.8 |
9.8 |
14.2 |
2.3 |
5.0 |
West Asians/Arabs |
86.6 |
80.0 |
7.9 |
11.7 |
5.5 |
8.3 |
Latin Americans |
87.8 |
81.1 |
9.9 |
14.7 |
2.3 |
4.3 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile
of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social
Statistics Division, 1995.
Only about 2% of the Southeast Asian male income originated from
other sources. The entire male population received about 9% of its income from other
sources. Looking at the composition of total income among females, Southeast Asian women
received a slightly higher percentage of their income from employment compared to the
total female population in Toronto (Table 9.9). Notably, Southeast Asian women derived
about 14% of their total income from government transfer payments compared to a 10% for
all women. Of the other minority groups, only Latin American women exceeded the proportion
observed among the Southeast Asian ethnic groups. The data indicate that Southeast Asian
women received a higher percentage of their income from government transfers in comparison
to Southeast Asian men. However, the margin between Southeast Asian men and women on this
variable does not differ much from that observed between the total populations of each
gender in the metropolitan area. On the whole, women on average receive a somewhat higher
percentage of their income from transfer payments compared to men. Southeast Asian women
received only about 5% of their total income from sources other than employment and
transfer payments. This figure was less than half of that found among the total female
population in the CMA and was lower than that observed among about half of the other
minority groups.
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
The 1991 census recorded an unemployment rate of 18.5% among
Vietnamese males 15 years and over (Table 9.10). This figure was more than double that
compiled for the entire male population in the metropolitan area. The Vietnamese
unemployment rate was also higher than that of any of the other minority groups. Of the
other groups, only Blacks, West Asians and Arabs, as well as Southeast Asians and Latin
Americans approached the Vietnamese figure. Vietnamese men 25 years and over displayed the
highest unemployment rate of all of the minority groups. The Vietnamese rate of 17.2% was
again well over double the figure for the entire male population in the CMA. Of the other
groups, only West Asians and Arabs, Latin Americans, and Southeast Asian men approached or
surpassed the 15% unemployment plateau.
The unemployment rate among Vietnamese men 25 years and over was a bit
lower than that observed among Vietnamese men as a whole. These differences reflect the
fact that unemployment rates were higher among the Vietnamese male population 15-24 years
of age. Perhaps the most important trend here, however, were not the relatively small
differences in unemployment rates among the different age groups but the depressingly high
unemployment rates among both cohorts of Vietnamese men.
Similar to their male counterparts, Vietnamese women 15 years and over
displayed the highest unemployment rate of all of the visible minority groups in the
Toronto metropolitan area. The rate for Vietnamese women was an astounding 20% - well over
double the figure for the entire female population in the CMA and a few percentage points
higher than the figure observed among Vietnamese men. Of the other groups, only South
Asian, West Asians and Arabs, Southeast Asians and Latin American women registered an
unemployment rate exceeding 15%. Interestingly, as a group, Vietnamese women 25 years and
over exhibited a slightly higher unemployment rate than the entire female Vietnamese
population 15 years and over. The unemployment rate of
Vietnamese women 25 and over was about 21%, this was almost 3 times the
unemployment rate for the total female population in the metropolitan area.
TABLE 9.10
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE, MALES AND FEMALES
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Unemployment Rate, %
|
Males
15 Years
and Over |
Females
15 Years
and Over |
Males
25 Years
and Over |
Females
25 Years
and Over |
|
Total Population |
8.6 |
8.4 |
7.4 |
7.7 |
Vietnamese |
18.5 |
20.1 |
17.2 |
20.7 |
Blacks |
15.1 |
11.9 |
13.1 |
10.2 |
SouthAsians |
12.2 |
15.7 |
11.4 |
15.0 |
Chinese |
9.7 |
10.3 |
8.3 |
9.5 |
Koreans |
7.6 |
7.7 |
6.2 |
5.7 |
Japanese |
4.4 |
5.8 |
3.4 |
5.1 |
Filipinos |
8.1 |
4.5 |
7.1 |
4.0 |
Southeast Asians |
16.7 |
18.0 |
16.0 |
18.0 |
West Asians/Arabs |
15.2 |
17.5 |
14.5 |
17.3 |
Latin Americans |
16.9 |
18.0 |
15.7 |
18.4 |
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of
1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada,
Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.
CLASS OF WORKER AND SELF-EMPLOYMENT
About 96% of enumerated Vietnamese men in the metropolitan area
were employees compared to about 88% of the total male population (Table 9.11). Only a
very small proportion of Vietnamese men were self-employed, either in incorporated or
unincorporated businesses. About 4% of Vietnamese men were self-employed compared to
almost 12% of the total male population in the CMA. Vietnamese men were less likely to be
self-employed than members of most of the other minority groups as well. Of the other
groups, it was the extent of self-employment among West Asians and Arabs and especially
Korean men which stands out.
Somewhat similar trends were apparent among females 15 years and over
(Table 9.11). Around 94% of Vietnamese women were employees, paralleling the proportion
among all women in the metropolitan area. Just over 5% of enumerated Vietnamese women were
self-employed in 1991. This figure was about the same as that registered by the entire
female population in the CMA which was several percentage points lower than the average
for the overall male population. Each minority group exhibited very low proportions in the
self-employed category with the exception again of Koreans. The discrepancy in proportions
of self-employed among Korean women, the total population, and most of the other minority
groups was even greater than it was among the men.
TABLE 9.11
CLASS OF WORKER, MALES AND FEMALES, 15 YEARS AND OVER
VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS
TORONTO CMA, 1991
Class of Workers by Category, %1
|
% Employees |
% Self-Employed |
|
Males |
Females |
Males |
Females |
|
Total Population |
87.8 |
94.2 |
12.1 |
5.5 |
Vietnamese |
96.0 |
94.4 |
3.9 |
5.3 |
Blacks |
93.9 |
97.5 |
6.0 |
2.3 |
South Asians |
91.5 |
96.0 |
8.4 |
3.3 |
Chinese |
87.4 |
93.8 |
12.4 |
5.8 |
Koreans |
59.6 |
63.0 |
37.7 |
33.4 |
Japanese |
88.0 |
92.5 |
11.8 |
6.9 |
Filipinos |
96.7 |
97.8 |
3.0 |
2.3 |
Southeast Asians |
95.6 |
96.5 |
4.4 |
5.0 |
West Asians/Arabs |
82.7 |
92.2 |
17.2 |
7.4 |
Latin Americans |
94.8 |
97.0 |
5.0 |
2.9 |
1 Self-Employed includes
enumerated respondents who claimed they were self-employed in both incorporated and
unincorporated establishments, % do not add up 100% in all rows.
Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile
of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social
Statistics Division, 1995.
SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
The census data paint a very distressing picture. Compared to the
total population and other minority groups, Vietnamese men and women were very much
overrepresented in the so-called secondary sector jobs, particularly in certain
manufacturing positions within the broad category of product fabricating, assembly, and
repair and to a lesser extent service-related jobs in accommodations, food, and beverages.
At the same time, Vietnamese were underrepresented in primary sector jobs in managerial,
administrative, and related occupations and the professions including finance, insurance,
and real estate, business services, education services, government services, and health
and social services. It is of course these latter positions that often tend to be of more
stable duration and are better compensated in terms of salary and benefits. The income
status of Vietnamese in Toronto was also one of extreme marginality. The average income of
Vietnamese men and women who worked full-time was about 60-70% that of the average for the
total population in Toronto. In several income categories, Vietnamese were at or near the
bottom compared to other visible minority groups. Equally sobering were the unemployment
rates enumerated among persons of Vietnamese ethnic origin. Unemployment rates exhibited
by Vietnamese men and women were more than double the average for the entire population of
both genders in the Toronto metropolitan area. The Vietnamese unemployment rate was also
higher than that found among any of the other visible minority groups it approached
20% among men and among women exceeded this figure. It is possible that the very high
unemployment rate exhibited by Vietnamese men and women may in fact be related to their
concentration in manufacturing jobs, especially positions in product fabricating,
assembly, and repair. Restructuring and the resulting deindustrialization of the Toronto
economy over the 1980s and early 1990s resulted in the loss of thousands of manufacturing
jobs, particularly, in the low-value added industrial sectors where immigrants in the city
have traditionally found employment (Preston and Giles, 1997). Furthermore, the 1991
census enumeration was conducted at the time of a recession. An estimated 60,000
manufacturing jobs were lost in the Toronto region between 1990 and 1992 alone (Murdie,
1995). It is likely that the recession took a particularly severe toll on the Vietnamese
labour force, given the occupational distribution of the population.
Social scientists in the U.S. and Canada have identified a number of
circumstances which seem to be related to the socioeconomic adjustment of Vietnamese
refugees and immigrants. Scholars have noted a positive correlation between length of
residence and the occupational adaptation of Vietnamese and Southeast Asian refugees as a
whole (Rumbaut, 1989a; Beiser and Johnson, 1994; Rumbaut, 1995; Montgomery, 1996). There
is agreement among most scholars that fluency in English is a key intervening variable
influencing socioeconomic trajectories of Vietnamese in the context of North America
(Neuwirth, 1987; Samuel, 1987; Rumbaut, 1989a; Rutledge, 1992; Neuwirth, 1993: Hung and
Haines, 1996; Lam, 1996). As observed in an earlier chapter, compared to most of the other
major visible minority groups residing in Toronto, the Vietnamese have arrived relatively
recently. The 1991 census figures also showed that the Vietnamese population in Toronto
possessed less facility in English or French, as well as more limited backgrounds in
formal education when compared to other predominantly visible minority groups. The
Vietnamese distribution on these latter variables may be attributed to the fact that many
Vietnamese came to Canada as refugees or family-sponsored as opposed to independent
immigrants. The socioeconomic profile of the Vietnamese relative to other groups may be
partially accounted for by the differential context of their arrival.
Age and health have also been found to be correlated to economic
adjustment among Vietnamese refugees (Chan, 1983; Chan, 1987; Chan and Lam, 1987; Rumbaut,
1989a; Rumbaut, 1991; Beiser and Johnson, 1994; Hung and Haines, 1996, Lam, 1996). Older
Vietnamese, especially those who migrated when they were older than 40 years of age, often
experience a very difficult time finding meaningful employment. The poor socioeconomic
adaptation of older Vietnamese is in part related to the extreme hardship older refugees
and immigrants confront in attempting to learn and use English. Physical and mental health
problems are also not uncommon among many Vietnamese who came to Canada or the U.S. as
refugees. These difficulties pose obvious barriers to obtaining and holding onto
well-compensated, long-term employment.
Gold and Kibria (1993) argue that a "blocked mobility thesis"
of ethnic and racial labour market segmentation is applicable to the experiences of many
Vietnamese-Americans. Lam (1996) makes similar claims in his longitudinal study of
Vietnam-born ethnic Chinese residing in Montreal. The "blocked mobility thesis"
posits that ethnic immigrant groups face structural and cultural barriers as well as
discrimination in the host society, all of which serve to restrict their entry into
mainstream socioeconomic activities. Lam (1996) conducted ethnographic interviews with
about 50 Chinese-Vietnamese individuals at three intervals 1981, 1986, and 1991. He
notes that the economic incorporation of his research population reflected the
consequences of being effectively blocked by institutional barriers encountered in the
mainstream Canadian economy.
Lam writes of his informants: "A smooth and rapid entry into the
Canadian mainstream economy was hindered by factors such as non-recognition of their
professional qualifications by potential employers, effective controls by professional
associations or licensing bodies in making decisions regarding entry into the professions
and licensed occupations and discriminatory practices used against these
Vietnamese-Chinese refugees by some employers." (Lam, p. 163)
Lam emphasized that underemployment as opposed to unemployment was the
predominant long-term labour market experience of his research subjects. Many of his
respondents, a decade after coming to Canada, were still trapped in a cycle of dead-end
jobs working in low-skilled secondary and informal sector positions such as janitorial
work, cooking and dishwashing in restaurants, factory employment and general labourer
jobs. These positions of course tend to be of short-term duration, lack security and
benefits, and are usually associated with small non-unionized employers who pay close to
the minimum wage.
According to several American scholars, long term underemployment and
downward occupational mobility in low-paying jobs have also been a common experience among
Vietnamese in the United States (Bach and Carroll Seguin, 1986; Haines, 1987; Caplan,
Whitmore, and Choy, 1989; Bach and Agiros, 1991; Hein, 1993; Rumbaut, 1995). In an
overview of the adaptation of Indochinese refugees, Haines (1996) cites a 1992 national
survey conducted by the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement. In this particular study,
11.2% of the Southeast Asian refugees interviewed had possessed professional or managerial
backgrounds in their home countries but only 0.9% of these same persons had achieved
similar types of work in the United States. Haines also notes that in the 1990 U.S.
census, Vietnamese participated in the labour force at about the same rate as the general
U.S. population (64.5% for the Vietnamese as opposed to 65.3% for all Americans). However,
at the same time, Vietnamese across the United States earned a much lower per capita
individual income ($9,033 as opposed to $14,420 for all Americans).
Several of my own informants, including a number of Vietnamese
employment counselors, noted that a similar pattern of underemployment in low-paying jobs
primarily in the secondary sector of the economy mixed with occasional bouts of
unemployment is a common labour market trajectory of Vietnamese in the Toronto area. This
situation does not necessarily improve with time spent in Canada. Many Vietnamese who came
to Canada in their late teens or in early adulthood in the early to mid-1980s continue to
experience only a marginal relationship to the mainstream labour market.
Confronting restricted access to attractive, well-paid employment in
the mainstream labour market, Vietnamese refugees and immigrants use a variety of means to
support themselves. Many Vietnamese find work within the so-called informal sector of the
economy. Lam (1996) observed babysitting, electronics repair, hairdressing, and cooking
food at home for sale at restaurants and groceries were common income-earning activities
of his Chinese-Vietnamese informants in Montreal. In Toronto, I have interacted informally
with many Vietnamese who engage in these and other informal income-producing activities
including wormpicking, yard care, home renovation, cooking food for sale to supermarkets,
and door-to-door sales of chimney caps. In addition I have met many Vietnamese who own
industrial strength sewing machines which they use to sew garments at a piece rate for
garment manufacturers in Toronto. The classifieds in any given issue of Thoi Bao,
the highest circulated Vietnamese language newspaper in Toronto, usually contain many
advertisements placed by garment manufacturers seeking Vietnamese labour. An example of
such an advertisement appeared in both English and Vietnamese in the October 8, 1998
edition: "Wanted!! Experienced Sewing Machine Operator With Own Single and Serger
Machine".
Lam (1996) found that a number of his Chinese-Vietnamese informants had
given up hope of achieving worthwhile employment in the mainstream economy and had opened
up small businesses, particularly restaurants and groceries. Gold (1992, 1993) writes of a
similar response among Chinese-Vietnamese in Southern California to institutional barriers
and blocked socioeconomic mobility. In Orange County, California "Little
Saigon", a large enclave of co-ethnic commercial and service establishments for
mostly owned by Chinese-Vietnamese, has arisen. In contrast to the apparent
Chinese-Vietnamese proclivity towards employment in self-owned businesses, the census data
make it clear that a turn to self-employment is not common among ethnic Vietnamese in
Toronto. In fact, the enumerated population of Vietnamese ethnic origin exhibited lower
levels of self-employment compared to the total population of the CMA as a whole as well
as most of the other minority groups.
Many Vietnamese have utilized friendship and kinship networks to pool
socioeconomic resources and achieve economic self-sufficiency in spite of their
marginalized position within the mainstream economy. This phenomenon of resource pooling
has been well-documented in the literature on Vietnamese socioeconomic adaptation in the
U.S. (Haines, Rutherford, and Thomas, 1981; Haines, 1988; Caplan, Whitmore, and Choy,
1989; Kibria, 1989; Kibria, 1993; Kibria, 1994; Zhou and Bankston, 1994; Hung and Haines,
1996; Zhou and Bankston, 1998). I have observed a similar economic survival strategy
practiced among many Vietnamese families in the Toronto area. Vietnamese households are
often large, consisting of older parents and numerous grown children as well as young
people. The members of the household typically contribute their various sources of income
(paycheck, cash earned from "informal sources", and government social assistance
checks) to the female parent. This older woman, in turn, decides how the total sum should
best be used to meet the needs of the individual members and the family as a whole.
In my extensive interactions with Vietnamese individuals in Toronto I
have observed a number of extended families who have utilized just such a strategy to
achieve a variety of goals intended to improve the long-term socioeconomic trajectory of
the household. These families usually consist of several adult members who have pooled
their resources to help pay for the university schooling of young family members as well
as to purchase single-family homes in outlying areas of the metropolitan area. In sum, the
family functions together as a cohesive economic unit combining enough resources for
subsistence despite the often meager financial contributions of individual members.
To
Chapter 10
Abstract/Acknowledgements/Table
of Contents - [ Chapters - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 ] - Appendices - References
Cited
Back
to Top
|