"Community", Adaptation and the Vietnamese in Toronto

By Mark Edward Pfeifer

Ó Copyright by Mark Edward Pfeifer (1999)

 


Abstract/Acknowledgements/Table of Contents - [ Chapters - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 ] -  Appendices - References Cited


PART III

RELATIONSHIPS OF THE VIETNAMESE WITH

THE HOST SOCIETY IN TORONTO

CHAPTER NINE

VIETNAMESE INCORPORATION IN THE

MAINSTREAM TORONTO ECONOMY

INTRODUCTION

Scholars have attempted to account for the differential status attainment and social mobility of immigrant groups over time. Following the logic of the assimilation model, research has indicated that to some extent, differences in socioeconomic attainment (occupational status and income) may be related to the human capital characteristics associated with the individuals who compose particular groups. Examples of such human capital variables include parental background, education, and occupational training, work background, as well as English proficiency and duration of residence in the host society (Hirschmann 1982; Morawska, 1990; Hiebert, 1993). However, even after all of these variables are held constant in empirical analyses, scholars have observed significant differences in socioeconomic attainment among different groups, supporting the hypothesis that factors beyond personal human capital affect mobility. Social scientific explanations for the differential socioeconomic status of immigrant minority groups as opposed to the dominant majority population have centered upon the influence of a sectoral segmentation of labour. Scholars have emphasized that regardless of the human capital characteristics possessed by individuals belonging to certain minority groups, a differential insertion into the labour market inhibits access to equal opportunities and negatively influences occupational status and earnings (Li, 1990; Satzewich, 1991)

A perspective commonly referred to as dual labour market theory has been applied to the situation of immigrants. Researchers have observed that many immigrant minority groups residing in the United States and Canada are situated within distinct segments of the larger labour market compared to the majority population. A plethora of studies have indicated that many immigrant minorities are significantly underrepresented in the `primary’ tier of occupations, which include the professions and jobs in large corporations. The primary jobs are usually associated with greater skill requirements and/or a high level of unionization. Persons working in the primary sector generally possess higher wages and experience upward mobility in relation to education and years on the job. These positions also tend to be relatively secure when the economy is in recession. Conversely, members of many immigrant and `racial’ minority groups tend to be over-concentrated in the so-called `secondary’ component of the economy. Employees in the secondary sector usually receive little return for prior experience or education as the information needed to do their jobs is assumed by their employers to be acquired quickly. Employment in the secondary tier is often unskilled, repetitive or monotonous in nature and is associated with low renumeration, a lack of meaningful benefits, and an unstable and often quite limited duration. These jobs are often associated with less pleasant working conditions and often do not provide much opportunity for worker mobility or advancement. Jobs in the secondary sector include positions in manufacturing, the service industries, and retail (Morawska, 1990; Heisler, 1992; Hiebert, 1993; Yamanaka and McClelland, 1994).

Scholars have also devoted much recent attention to ethnic economic enclaves – subeconomies consisting of immigrant-owned businesses employing co-ethnic labourers (Alba and Nee, 1997; Portes and Zhou, 1996). Many of the jobs in the ethnic economy also belong to the "informal" sector of the labour market. While the working conditions associated with enclave jobs may be exploitative, with wages at or below the minimum wage, these jobs also commonly involve relatively flexible arrangements between worker and employer with earnings paid "under the table". Working in co-ethnic firms also may provide employees with entrepreneurial experience and networks of capital and other resources they may call upon when setting up businesses of their own (Gold, 1992; Gold; 1994). Portes and his colleagues argue that members of certain immigrant groups have utilized the ethnic enclave as a strategy to overcome discrimination and institutional barriers in the labour market of the host society and achieve socioeconomic mobility (Portes and Manning, 1986; Portes and Zhou, 1996).

This chapter will investigate the experiences of the Vietnamese ethnic origin population in the mainstream Toronto economy. The following interrelated research questions will guide the analysis: How did the Vietnamese ethnic origin population enumerated in 1991 compare to the total population of the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) as well other major "visible"minority groups in terms of its representation on a range of socioeconomic variables including occupational and income distribution, income composition, unemployment, and rates of self-employment? What are some of the factors which might help account for the labour market incorporation of the Vietnamese ethnic origin population? What are some of the other strategies Vietnamese-Canadians have used to achieve subsistence as well as advance socioeconomically in addition to employment in the mainstream Toronto labour market?

The first portion of the chapter will analyze the distribution of this population on a range of socioeconomic variables drawn from the 1991 census. Where possible, the data is broken down by gender. Throughout the analysis, the Vietnamese distributions on all of these variables will be assessed in relation to those exhibited by the entire population of the Toronto CMA and other significant minority populations including Black, South Asian, West Asian/Arab, and Southeast Asian ethnic groups as well as Chinese, Filipinos, Koreans and Japanese. In the latter portion of the chapter, the socioeconomic profile of the enumerated Vietnamese population will be discussed within the context of the work of other scholars who have studied the economic adaptation of persons of Vietnamese origin and other minority groups in both Canada and the United States.

OCCUPATIONAL DISTRIBUTION BY GENDER

The analysis of census data begins with a look at the occupational distribution of Vietnamese men and women enumerated in 1991 relative to the total labour force in the Toronto CMA. The most notable finding is the rather remarkable concentration of Vietnamese males in machining, product fabricating, assembly and repair positions (Table 9.1). Well over 1/3 of Vietnamese men were employed in these manufacturing jobs in comparison to around 10% of the entire male labour force. Within this larger category, over 90% of Vietnamese men worked in product fabricating, assembly, and repair as opposed to machining occupations. Conversely, Vietnamese men were very much underrepresented in managerial, administrative, and related occupations compared to the total labour force. The Vietnamese proportion in these jobs was only about a quarter of that exhibited by the entire male labour force in Toronto. Furthermore, the percentage of Vietnamese men working in sales positions was less than half of the 10% of the total male labour force possessing occupations in this sector. Vietnamese men were somewhat underrepresented in most of the other major job classifications as well including teaching and related occupations, health and medicine, natural and social sciences, religious, art and related occupations, clerical work, sales positions, services, construction trades, and transport equipment operating jobs.

 

TABLE 9.1

OCCUPATIONAL DISTRIBUTION, MALES AND FEMALES

VIETNAMESE AND TOTAL LABOUR FORCE

TORONTO CMA, 1991

 

Vietnamese Total Labour Force
%
Men
%
Women
%
Men
%
Women

Managerial, Administrative, and Related Occupations 4.7 6.0 18.4 14.2
Teaching and Related Occupations 1.0 1.8 2.4 5.8
Health and Medicine 1.7 5.2 1.8 6.8
Natural and Social Sciences, Religious, Art, and Related Occupations 8.1 5.6 12.0 8.0
Clerical 7.6 22.3 10.3 34.0
Sales 4.5 6.4 10.1 9.5
Services 7.6 9.8 9.5 11.2
Primary 0.6 0.4 1.5 0.5
Processing 5.2 2.6 2.2 1.1
Machining, Product Fabricating, Assembly and Repair 35.7 27.4 11.3 4.3
Construction Trades 6.7 0.8 8.5 0.4
Transport Equipment Operating 2.0 0.4 4.9 0.7
Other 14.5 11.0 7.3 3.5

Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

Assessing the occupational distribution of Vietnamese women enumerated in 1991, a similar overrepresentation in manufacturing positions is evident (Table 9.1). Almost 30% of Vietnamese women worked in machining, product fabricating, assembly and repair jobs while less then 5% of the total female labour force held positions in this category. Within this larger classification of jobs, most Vietnamese worked in product fabricating, assembly and repair as opposed to machining. Also like their male counterparts, Vietnamese women displayed greater proportions in "Other" jobs not classified on the census form as well as processing positions. Over 20% of Vietnamese women worked in clerical jobs, but this figure was more than 10 percentage points lower than that associated with the total female labour force. Vietnamese women were notably underrepresented in managerial, administrative and related occupations, teaching and related occupations, sales, and to a lesser extent health and medicine and services.

INDUSTRY DIVISIONS

In terms of industry distribution, the Vietnamese in the Toronto CMA displayed a remarkable concentration within manufacturing compared to all other groups in 1991. About 44% of the total enumerated Vietnamese labour force were employed in manufacturing (Tables 9.2 and 9.3).With the exception of Southeast Asians as a whole, no other group was nearly so concentrated in this particular industrial category.

TABLE 9.2

LABOUR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, MALES AND FEMALES

VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Labour Force 15 Years and Over by Industry, %1

All Services

Manu-
Fact.
Con-
Util.
Trade Fin. Bus. Govt. Edu. Health Accom. Industries
n
(in 1000)

Total Labour

17.3

13.5

18.0

9.0

9.4

5.5

6.2

7.2

5.7

2,381

Vietnamese 43.8 8.3 16.5 4.2 5.1 2.2 2.2 4.5 6.2 10

Blacks

18.2

11.6

16.8

8.7

7.6

5.9

3.3

12.5

7.6

146

SouthAsians

26.0

9.4

18.9

10.4

9.5

4.7

3.3

5.8

6.2

138

Chinese

19.9

7.4

17.9

12.6

10.9

3.9

4.2

6.3

11.4

137

Koreans

8.8

4.6

41.7

5.4

6.2

2.5

3.1

5.2

11.8

13

Japanese

14.3

9.5

21.4

7.4

13.2

5.4

7.4

6.6

5.9

10

Filipinos

15.5

6.4

12.5

11.1

6.7

4.2

2.1

16.8

6.5

48

Southeast Asians

42.9

7.7

15.5

4.3

5.4

2.6

2.5

5.2

6.5

16

West Asians

15.5

12.6

24.5

7.6

9.5

3.4

5.2

5.0

9.6

39

Latin Americans

25.9

12.4

17.1

6.4

6.0

3.3

3.2

5.4

9.4

25

1Percentages for employment in "Primary Industries" and "Service Industries" are excluded due to very low percentages.

Full Labels of column headings: Manufact. = Manufacturing; Con-Util = Construction, Transportation, Communication, and other Utilities, Fin.= Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate; Bus. = Business Services; Govt. = Government Services; Edu. = Education Services; Health = Health and Social Services; Accom. = Accomodation, Food and Beverage Services

Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

As for jobs in the broad categories of construction, transportation, communications and other utilities, the Vietnamese proportion was a bit lower than the average for the total CMA labour force but did not differ substantially from most of the other visible minority groups. About 16% of the Vietnamese were employed in the industrial classification of trade, which was very close to the 18% average for the entire labour force. Among the other minority groups, the Koreans were by far the most heavily concentrated in trade. The Vietnamese were notably underrepresented compared to the total Toronto CMA labour force and other minority groups in several industrial categories. Occupations in which Vietnamese were not well represented included positions in several professional sectors, among these were Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate, Business Services, Government Services, Education Services, and Health and Social Services. The enumerated Vietnamese labour force showed a slightly higher proportion than the entire Toronto labour force in the category of accommodation, food, and beverage services. However, the Chinese and Korean shares in this industrial classification were nearly double the Vietnamese figure. In terms of employment in the broad category of other service industries, the Vietnamese percentage was marginally lower than the figure for the total Toronto labour force. Koreans, Latin Americans, and especially Filipinos were overrepresented in the service occupations.

INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTION AND GENDER

Unfortunately, directly comparable industry distribution data organized by gender was not available for both the Vietnamese ethnic origin population and the other visible minority groups. In this section, the distributions of males and females are analyzed by using Southeast Asians as a surrogate variable. As noted in an earlier chapter, about 70% of the Southeast Asians enumerated in the census in 1991 were of Vietnamese ethnic origin. On almost every variable in the census, the Southeast Asian figure was very close to that of the Vietnamese.

Among the male labour force in the Toronto CMA, Southeast Asians were overwhelmingly concentrated in manufacturing industries in 1991 (Table 9.4). The Southeast Asian figure of nearly 50% was more than double that observed among the total male work force of the metropolitan area. No other minority group showed more than 30% of its male labour force in manufacturing. Southeast Asians in the Toronto CMA were underrepresented in construction, transportation, communication, and other utilities. Southeast Asian males were slightly underrepresented in trade in comparison to the total male population. By comparison, Korean men were very much overrepresented in this category. Highly notable were the miniscule proportions of the Southeast Asian male labour force found in the occupations of finance, insurance, and real estate, business services, government services, education services, and health and social services. Within these economic sectors, Southeast Asian men exhibited proportions below most of the other minority groups. In accommodation, food, and beverage services, the Southeast Asian male percentage was parallel to that of the total male labour force of the CMA. All of the other minority groups with the exception of the Japanese exhibited larger proportions within this category. In the other services classification, Southeast Asian males displayed a slightly lower proportion than the male labour force as a whole. A few groups, notably Japanese, Latin Americans, and especially Koreans, possessed greater proportions in these occupations compared to the overall CMA average for men.

 

 

TABLE 9.4

LABOUR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, MALES

SOUTHEAST ASIANS AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Labour Force 15 Years and Over by Industry, %1

All Services

Manu-
Fact.
Con-
Util.
Trade Fin. Bus. Govt. Edu. Health Accom. Industries
n
(in 1000)

Total Labour Force

20.6

19.5

18.1

7.0

9.4

5.5

4.2

2.8

5.5

1,255

Blacks

24.1

18.1

18.7

5.6

7.7

5.7

2.6

3.2

7.7

69

South Asians

28.9

12.5

18.8

7.5

10.2

4.4

2.6

2.8

7.1

78

Chinese

20.6

10.1

18.5

9.8

11.6

3.6

3.2

3.6

14.0

72

Koreans

9.7

6.9

42.5

4.6

6.4

3.0

3.0

3.0

10.2

6

Japanese

17.6

13.0

23.0

6.0

13.9

4.4

4.4

4.3

5.6

5

Filipinos

26.8

11.0

15.4

9.9

7.6

4.1

2.1

8.4

8.9

17

Southeast Asians

47.5

10.5

15.1

2.9

4.9

2.7

1.9

2.6

6.1

9

West Asians

17.7

17.1

24.5

5.9

9.3

2.9

3.1

3.1

10.7

25

Latin Americans

29.0

18.8

16.4

4.6

6.3

2.6

2.1

2.5

9.2

13

1Percentages for employment in "Primary Industries" and "Service Industries" are excluded due to very low percentages.

Full Labels of column headings: Manufact. = Manufacturing; Con-Util = Construction, Transportation,

Communication, and other Utilities, Fin.= Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate; Bus. = Business Services; Govt. = Government Services; Edu. = Education Services; Health = Health and Social Services; Accom. = Accomodation, Food and Beverage Services

Source: Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

TABLE 9.5

LABOUR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, FEMALES

SOUTHEAST ASIANS AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Labour Force by Industry, %1

All Services

Manu-
Fact.
Con-
Util.
Trade Fin. Bus. Govt. Edu. Health Accom. Industries
n
(in 1000)

Total Labour Force

13.6

6.7

17.9

11.2

9.5

5.5

8.4

12.1

5.8

1125

Blacks

12.8

5.7

15.0

11.6

7.6

6.0

3.9

20.9

7.8

76

South Asians

22.3

5.4

19.0

14.1

8.6

5.1

4.1

9.6

5.0

60

Chinese

19.1

4.4

17.2

15.6

10.1

4.2

5.3

9.4

8.6

65

Koreans

7.8

2.3

40.6

6.3

6.0

1.9

3.3

7.7

13.5

6

Japanese

10.5

5.3

19.5

9.1

12.4

6.6

10.8

9.2

6.3

4

Filipinos

9.2

3.8

10.9

11.6

6.2

4.2

2.1

21.4

5.2

30

Southeast Asians

36.4

3.6

15.9

6.3

6.1

2.4

3.4

8.8

7.1

6

West Asians

11.6

4.4

24.5

10.6

9.9

4.4

8.8

8.6

7.7

14

Latin Americans

22.3

5.0

17.9

8.5

5.8

4.2

4.4

8.8

9.6

11

 

1Percentages for employment in "Primary Industries" and "Service Industries" are excluded due to very low percentages.

Full Labels of column headings: Manufact. = Manufacturing; Con-Util = Construction, Transportation,

Communication, and other Utilities, Fin.= Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate; Bus. = Business Services; Govt. = Government Services; Edu. = Education Services; Health = Health and Social Services; Accom. = Accomodation, Food and Beverage Services

Source: Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

 

Among the female labour force in the Toronto CMA, Southeast Asian women were also overrepresented in manufacturing (Table 9.5). The share of Southeast Asian women enumerated in manufacturing jobs was nearly triple the figure for the entire female labour force in the metropolitan area. No other minority group was nearly as well represented in manufacturing occupations. Southeast Asian women were less likely to work in the construction, transportation, communications, and other utilities occupations compared to the female labour force as a whole. Southeast Asian women were also somewhat underrepresented in trade-oriented jobs compared to the total female labour force. Similar to their male counterparts, Korean women were highly concentrated in trade, much more so than any of the other minority groups. Like Southeast Asian men, Southeast Asian women were significantly underrepresented in the professional sectors of finance, insurance, and real estate, business services, government services, and education services. Southeast Asian women were also somewhat less likely to work in health and social services compared to the Toronto female labour force. By contrast, a few minority groups, notably Black and Filipino women, were especially well represented in this category. Southeast Asian women were slightly more likely to work in the accommodations, food, and beverage service jobs in comparison to the entire Toronto female labour force. In other services occupations, Southeast Asian women showed about the same proportion as the total female labour force but less than several other minority groups.

INCOME

Stunning differences in income distinquished Vietnamese men from the total male population and most of the other minority groups in 1991 (Table 9.6). The average employment income of Vietnamese men who worked full-time was just $28,047. This figure was only about 63% of the average income for the entire male population who worked full-time in the CMA. The average income for Vietnamese men employed full-time was in fact the lowest of all of the visible minority groups. Only two of the other minority populations – Southeast Asians as a whole, and Latin Americans – were below $30,000 on this variable. The average employment income for Vietnamese men in the Toronto CMA who worked part-time was just $13,387. Again, this figure was the lowest of all of the minority groups. It was about 2/3 of the average employment income observed among the total male population in the metropolitan area who worked part-time.

The average employment income among Vietnamese women was $22,181 (Table 9.6). This figure was about 75% of the average for the entire full-time female workforce in the metropolitan area. The average employment income for Vietnamese women who worked full-time was lower than that of all of the other minority groups with the exception of Latin Americans. The average employment income of Vietnamese females who worked part-time was $11,847. This number was a little bit more than 85% of the average for the total population of female part-time workers. The average employment income for Vietnamese females who worked part-time did not differ much from that of several of the other minority groups. South Asian, Korean, Southeast Asian, and Latin American women actually displayed slightly lower figures. In general, it may be stated that most women who worked part-time experience very low incomes, in comparison to men who were employed less than full-time.

 

 

TABLE 9.6

INCOME, MALES AND FEMALES, 15 YEARS AND OVER

VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Average Employment Income, $

Males
Worked
Full Year
Full Time
Females
Worked
Full Year
Full Time
Males
Worked
Part Year
Part Time
Females
Worked
Part Year
Part Time

Total Population

44,497

29,830

20,232

13,728

Vietnamese

28,047

22,181

13,387

11,847

Blacks

32,393

25,193

15,494

12,907

South Asians

33,972

24,925

16,067

11,733

Chinese

37,345

27,677

16,045

12,941

Koreans

33,807

24,146

14,527

11,178

Japanese

53,039

33,044

24,479

14,591

Filipinos

33,565

24,244

16,048

13,639

Southeast Asians

28,787

22,305

13,840

11,619

West Asians/Arabs

37,153

27,530

17,251

12,196

Latin Americans

29,078

21,555

15,504

10,929

Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

 

TABLE 9.7

AVERAGE AND MEDIAN INCOME, MALES AND FEMALES

VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Average and Median Income,

Males and Females 15 Years and Over, $

Average
Income
Males
Average
Income
Females
Median
Income
Males
Median
Income
Females

Total Population

35,779

21,855

29,558

18,550

Vietnamese

20,885

15,282

20,315

13,518

Blacks

24,937

18,794

23,107

17,543

South Asians

26,865

17,687

23,525

15,909

Chinese

27,794

19,134

23,076

15,951

Koreans

24,833

16,747

18,250

12,931

Japanese

43,026

24,418

34,051

20,962

Filipinos

25,726

19,407

25,213

17,186

Southeast Asians

21,984

16,017

20,860

14,188

West Asians/Arabs

27,474

17,717

21,492

13,872

Latin Americans

22,577

15,106

20,717

13,219

Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

Examining the average and median income of Vietnamese men and women 15 years and over (Table 9.7), similar patterns were evident. The average income of enumerated Vietnamese males 15 years and over in the Toronto CMA was $20,855 in 1991. Again, this figure was the lowest of all of the minority groups. The average income of Vietnamese males was just 58% of that for the entire male population in the metropolitan area. In terms of median income for men 15 years and over, the Vietnamese figure was $20,315. This was just below 70% of the median income for the total male population in Toronto. Of the other minority groups, only Korean men had a lower median income. The average income of enumerated Vietnamese females 15 years and over was $15,282. This was about 70% of the average income for the entire female population of the CMA. Among the other minority groups, only Latin American women had a lower average income. The median income of enumerated Vietnamese females was $13,815. This figure was about ¾ of that for the entire female population in the metropolitan area. Of the other groups, Latin American and Korean women had lower median incomes.

Assessing all of the income figures, it may be summarized that both Vietnamese men and women experienced very low incomes in comparison to the total population in Toronto. Regardless of full or part-time status or gender, Vietnamese incomes were consistently among the lowest of the groups defined by Statistics Canada as visible minorities. It should be noted, however, that the disparities between the incomes of Vietnamese females and the total female population, while noteworthy, were not as great as those apparent between Vietnamese men and the entire male population of the metropolitan area. This situation is reflective of the fact that the incomes of all women were already much lower compared to those earned by men. Indeed, the average employment income of the total female full-time workforce in the Toronto CMA in 1991 was only about 2/3 of the average for the full-time male workforce.

COMPOSITION OF TOTAL INCOME

Assessing the composition of total income for both men and women combined, Vietnamese in the Toronto CMA derived 86% of their income from employment in 1991, compared to 82% for the total population (Table 9.8). Notable differences were apparent in terms of the proportion of income derived from government transfer payments. The enumerated Vietnamese received 12.5% of their earnings from transfer payments compared to 7.5% for the total population. No other minority group derived as large a a proportion of its income from transfers as the Vietnamese. Among the other minority groups, only the Southeast Asians as a whole and Latin Americans received more than 10% of their income from transfers.

Unfortunately, breakdowns of the total income composition in terms of gender were not available for the Vietnamese ethnic origin population. However, it is possible to again use Southeast Asians as a surrogate and compare this group (of which Vietnamese were slightly more than 2/3) to the entire population and the other minority groups. Among males, Southeast Asians did not differ much from the total population in terms of the proportion of total income which was derived from employment (Table 9.9). Differences were apparent however in the proportion of income received from government transfer payments. The average for the total male population in the CMA was about 6%. In comparison, Southeast Asian men derived about 10% of their total income from transfers. Among the other minority groups, only Latin American men matched this figure.

TABLE 9.8

COMPOSITION OF TOTAL INCOME

VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Composition of Total Income, %

Employment
Income
Government
Transfer Payments
Other
Income

Total Population

82.1

7.5

10.5

Vietnamese

86.3

12.5

1.2

Blacks

87.9

8.6

3.5

SouthAsians

89.0

6.9

4.1

Chinese

84.8

6.3

9.0

Koreans

85.4

7.8

6.8

Japanese

80.9

6.6

12.5

Filipinos

91.7

5.7

2.6

Southeast Asians

85.3

11.4

3.3

West Asians/Arabs

84.7

9.0

6.4

Latin Americans

85.2

11.8

3.1

Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

TABLE 9.9

COMPOSITION OF TOTAL INCOME, MALES AND FEMALES

SOUTHEAST ASIAN AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Composition of Total Income, %

Employment Income Government Transfer Other Income
Men Women Men Women Men Women

Total Population

84.9

77.5

5.9

10.0

9.2

12.6

Blacks

90.1

85.5

6.6

10.8

3.3

3.7

SouthAsians

90.1

86.9

6.0

8.5

3.9

4.6

Chinese

87.1

81.3

5.2

7.8

7.7

10.9

Koreans

87.7

82.1

6.3

10.1

6.0

7.8

Japanese

84.6

74.1

5.0

9.5

10.4

16.4

Filipinos

92.3

91.2

5.6

5.8

2.1

3.0

Southeast Asians

87.9

80.8

9.8

14.2

2.3

5.0

West Asians/Arabs

86.6

80.0

7.9

11.7

5.5

8.3

Latin Americans

87.8

81.1

9.9

14.7

2.3

4.3

Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

Only about 2% of the Southeast Asian male income originated from other sources. The entire male population received about 9% of its income from other sources. Looking at the composition of total income among females, Southeast Asian women received a slightly higher percentage of their income from employment compared to the total female population in Toronto (Table 9.9). Notably, Southeast Asian women derived about 14% of their total income from government transfer payments compared to a 10% for all women. Of the other minority groups, only Latin American women exceeded the proportion observed among the Southeast Asian ethnic groups. The data indicate that Southeast Asian women received a higher percentage of their income from government transfers in comparison to Southeast Asian men. However, the margin between Southeast Asian men and women on this variable does not differ much from that observed between the total populations of each gender in the metropolitan area. On the whole, women on average receive a somewhat higher percentage of their income from transfer payments compared to men. Southeast Asian women received only about 5% of their total income from sources other than employment and transfer payments. This figure was less than half of that found among the total female population in the CMA and was lower than that observed among about half of the other minority groups.

UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

The 1991 census recorded an unemployment rate of 18.5% among Vietnamese males 15 years and over (Table 9.10). This figure was more than double that compiled for the entire male population in the metropolitan area. The Vietnamese unemployment rate was also higher than that of any of the other minority groups. Of the other groups, only Blacks, West Asians and Arabs, as well as Southeast Asians and Latin Americans approached the Vietnamese figure. Vietnamese men 25 years and over displayed the highest unemployment rate of all of the minority groups. The Vietnamese rate of 17.2% was again well over double the figure for the entire male population in the CMA. Of the other groups, only West Asians and Arabs, Latin Americans, and Southeast Asian men approached or surpassed the 15% unemployment plateau.

The unemployment rate among Vietnamese men 25 years and over was a bit lower than that observed among Vietnamese men as a whole. These differences reflect the fact that unemployment rates were higher among the Vietnamese male population 15-24 years of age. Perhaps the most important trend here, however, were not the relatively small differences in unemployment rates among the different age groups but the depressingly high unemployment rates among both cohorts of Vietnamese men.

Similar to their male counterparts, Vietnamese women 15 years and over displayed the highest unemployment rate of all of the visible minority groups in the Toronto metropolitan area. The rate for Vietnamese women was an astounding 20% - well over double the figure for the entire female population in the CMA and a few percentage points higher than the figure observed among Vietnamese men. Of the other groups, only South Asian, West Asians and Arabs, Southeast Asians and Latin American women registered an unemployment rate exceeding 15%. Interestingly, as a group, Vietnamese women 25 years and over exhibited a slightly higher unemployment rate than the entire female Vietnamese population 15 years and over. The unemployment rate of

Vietnamese women 25 and over was about 21%, this was almost 3 times the unemployment rate for the total female population in the metropolitan area.

 

TABLE 9.10

UNEMPLOYMENT RATE, MALES AND FEMALES

VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Unemployment Rate, %

Males
15 Years
and Over
Females
15 Years
and Over
Males
25 Years
and Over
Females
25 Years
and Over

Total Population

8.6

8.4

7.4

7.7

Vietnamese

18.5

20.1

17.2

20.7

Blacks

15.1

11.9

13.1

10.2

SouthAsians

12.2

15.7

11.4

15.0

Chinese

9.7

10.3

8.3

9.5

Koreans

7.6

7.7

6.2

5.7

Japanese

4.4

5.8

3.4

5.1

Filipinos

8.1

4.5

7.1

4.0

Southeast Asians

16.7

18.0

16.0

18.0

West Asians/Arabs

15.2

17.5

14.5

17.3

Latin Americans

16.9

18.0

15.7

18.4

Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

CLASS OF WORKER AND SELF-EMPLOYMENT

About 96% of enumerated Vietnamese men in the metropolitan area were employees compared to about 88% of the total male population (Table 9.11). Only a very small proportion of Vietnamese men were self-employed, either in incorporated or unincorporated businesses. About 4% of Vietnamese men were self-employed compared to almost 12% of the total male population in the CMA. Vietnamese men were less likely to be self-employed than members of most of the other minority groups as well. Of the other groups, it was the extent of self-employment among West Asians and Arabs and especially Korean men which stands out.

Somewhat similar trends were apparent among females 15 years and over (Table 9.11). Around 94% of Vietnamese women were employees, paralleling the proportion among all women in the metropolitan area. Just over 5% of enumerated Vietnamese women were self-employed in 1991. This figure was about the same as that registered by the entire female population in the CMA which was several percentage points lower than the average for the overall male population. Each minority group exhibited very low proportions in the self-employed category with the exception again of Koreans. The discrepancy in proportions of self-employed among Korean women, the total population, and most of the other minority groups was even greater than it was among the men.

 

TABLE 9.11

CLASS OF WORKER, MALES AND FEMALES, 15 YEARS AND OVER

VIETNAMESE AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITY GROUPS

TORONTO CMA, 1991

Class of Workers by Category, %1

% Employees % Self-Employed
Males Females Males Females

Total Population

87.8

94.2

12.1

5.5

Vietnamese

96.0

94.4

3.9

5.3

Blacks

93.9

97.5

6.0

2.3

South Asians

91.5

96.0

8.4

3.3

Chinese

87.4

93.8

12.4

5.8

Koreans

59.6

63.0

37.7

33.4

Japanese

88.0

92.5

11.8

6.9

Filipinos

96.7

97.8

3.0

2.3

Southeast Asians

95.6

96.5

4.4

5.0

West Asians/Arabs

82.7

92.2

17.2

7.4

Latin Americans

94.8

97.0

5.0

2.9

1Self-Employed includes enumerated respondents who claimed they were self-employed in both incorporated and unincorporated establishments, % do not add up 100% in all rows.

Sources: Statistics Canada, Customized Tabulation of 1991 data; Profile of Visible Minorities: Ontario, Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Housing, Family and Social Statistics Division, 1995.

 

 

SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

The census data paint a very distressing picture. Compared to the total population and other minority groups, Vietnamese men and women were very much overrepresented in the so-called secondary sector jobs, particularly in certain manufacturing positions within the broad category of product fabricating, assembly, and repair and to a lesser extent service-related jobs in accommodations, food, and beverages. At the same time, Vietnamese were underrepresented in primary sector jobs in managerial, administrative, and related occupations and the professions including finance, insurance, and real estate, business services, education services, government services, and health and social services. It is of course these latter positions that often tend to be of more stable duration and are better compensated in terms of salary and benefits. The income status of Vietnamese in Toronto was also one of extreme marginality. The average income of Vietnamese men and women who worked full-time was about 60-70% that of the average for the total population in Toronto. In several income categories, Vietnamese were at or near the bottom compared to other visible minority groups. Equally sobering were the unemployment rates enumerated among persons of Vietnamese ethnic origin. Unemployment rates exhibited by Vietnamese men and women were more than double the average for the entire population of both genders in the Toronto metropolitan area. The Vietnamese unemployment rate was also higher than that found among any of the other visible minority groups – it approached 20% among men and among women exceeded this figure. It is possible that the very high unemployment rate exhibited by Vietnamese men and women may in fact be related to their concentration in manufacturing jobs, especially positions in product fabricating, assembly, and repair. Restructuring and the resulting deindustrialization of the Toronto economy over the 1980s and early 1990s resulted in the loss of thousands of manufacturing jobs, particularly, in the low-value added industrial sectors where immigrants in the city have traditionally found employment (Preston and Giles, 1997). Furthermore, the 1991 census enumeration was conducted at the time of a recession. An estimated 60,000 manufacturing jobs were lost in the Toronto region between 1990 and 1992 alone (Murdie, 1995). It is likely that the recession took a particularly severe toll on the Vietnamese labour force, given the occupational distribution of the population.

Social scientists in the U.S. and Canada have identified a number of circumstances which seem to be related to the socioeconomic adjustment of Vietnamese refugees and immigrants. Scholars have noted a positive correlation between length of residence and the occupational adaptation of Vietnamese and Southeast Asian refugees as a whole (Rumbaut, 1989a; Beiser and Johnson, 1994; Rumbaut, 1995; Montgomery, 1996). There is agreement among most scholars that fluency in English is a key intervening variable influencing socioeconomic trajectories of Vietnamese in the context of North America (Neuwirth, 1987; Samuel, 1987; Rumbaut, 1989a; Rutledge, 1992; Neuwirth, 1993: Hung and Haines, 1996; Lam, 1996). As observed in an earlier chapter, compared to most of the other major visible minority groups residing in Toronto, the Vietnamese have arrived relatively recently. The 1991 census figures also showed that the Vietnamese population in Toronto possessed less facility in English or French, as well as more limited backgrounds in formal education when compared to other predominantly visible minority groups. The Vietnamese distribution on these latter variables may be attributed to the fact that many Vietnamese came to Canada as refugees or family-sponsored as opposed to independent immigrants. The socioeconomic profile of the Vietnamese relative to other groups may be partially accounted for by the differential context of their arrival.

Age and health have also been found to be correlated to economic adjustment among Vietnamese refugees (Chan, 1983; Chan, 1987; Chan and Lam, 1987; Rumbaut, 1989a; Rumbaut, 1991; Beiser and Johnson, 1994; Hung and Haines, 1996, Lam, 1996). Older Vietnamese, especially those who migrated when they were older than 40 years of age, often experience a very difficult time finding meaningful employment. The poor socioeconomic adaptation of older Vietnamese is in part related to the extreme hardship older refugees and immigrants confront in attempting to learn and use English. Physical and mental health problems are also not uncommon among many Vietnamese who came to Canada or the U.S. as refugees. These difficulties pose obvious barriers to obtaining and holding onto well-compensated, long-term employment.

Gold and Kibria (1993) argue that a "blocked mobility thesis" of ethnic and racial labour market segmentation is applicable to the experiences of many Vietnamese-Americans. Lam (1996) makes similar claims in his longitudinal study of Vietnam-born ethnic Chinese residing in Montreal. The "blocked mobility thesis" posits that ethnic immigrant groups face structural and cultural barriers as well as discrimination in the host society, all of which serve to restrict their entry into mainstream socioeconomic activities. Lam (1996) conducted ethnographic interviews with about 50 Chinese-Vietnamese individuals at three intervals – 1981, 1986, and 1991. He notes that the economic incorporation of his research population reflected the consequences of being effectively blocked by institutional barriers encountered in the mainstream Canadian economy.

Lam writes of his informants: "A smooth and rapid entry into the Canadian mainstream economy was hindered by factors such as non-recognition of their professional qualifications by potential employers, effective controls by professional associations or licensing bodies in making decisions regarding entry into the professions and licensed occupations and discriminatory practices used against these Vietnamese-Chinese refugees by some employers." (Lam, p. 163)

Lam emphasized that underemployment as opposed to unemployment was the predominant long-term labour market experience of his research subjects. Many of his respondents, a decade after coming to Canada, were still trapped in a cycle of dead-end jobs working in low-skilled secondary and informal sector positions such as janitorial work, cooking and dishwashing in restaurants, factory employment and general labourer jobs. These positions of course tend to be of short-term duration, lack security and benefits, and are usually associated with small non-unionized employers who pay close to the minimum wage.

According to several American scholars, long term underemployment and downward occupational mobility in low-paying jobs have also been a common experience among Vietnamese in the United States (Bach and Carroll Seguin, 1986; Haines, 1987; Caplan, Whitmore, and Choy, 1989; Bach and Agiros, 1991; Hein, 1993; Rumbaut, 1995). In an overview of the adaptation of Indochinese refugees, Haines (1996) cites a 1992 national survey conducted by the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement. In this particular study, 11.2% of the Southeast Asian refugees interviewed had possessed professional or managerial backgrounds in their home countries but only 0.9% of these same persons had achieved similar types of work in the United States. Haines also notes that in the 1990 U.S. census, Vietnamese participated in the labour force at about the same rate as the general U.S. population (64.5% for the Vietnamese as opposed to 65.3% for all Americans). However, at the same time, Vietnamese across the United States earned a much lower per capita individual income ($9,033 as opposed to $14,420 for all Americans).

Several of my own informants, including a number of Vietnamese employment counselors, noted that a similar pattern of underemployment in low-paying jobs primarily in the secondary sector of the economy mixed with occasional bouts of unemployment is a common labour market trajectory of Vietnamese in the Toronto area. This situation does not necessarily improve with time spent in Canada. Many Vietnamese who came to Canada in their late teens or in early adulthood in the early to mid-1980s continue to experience only a marginal relationship to the mainstream labour market.

Confronting restricted access to attractive, well-paid employment in the mainstream labour market, Vietnamese refugees and immigrants use a variety of means to support themselves. Many Vietnamese find work within the so-called informal sector of the economy. Lam (1996) observed babysitting, electronics repair, hairdressing, and cooking food at home for sale at restaurants and groceries were common income-earning activities of his Chinese-Vietnamese informants in Montreal. In Toronto, I have interacted informally with many Vietnamese who engage in these and other informal income-producing activities including wormpicking, yard care, home renovation, cooking food for sale to supermarkets, and door-to-door sales of chimney caps. In addition I have met many Vietnamese who own industrial strength sewing machines which they use to sew garments at a piece rate for garment manufacturers in Toronto. The classifieds in any given issue of Thoi Bao, the highest circulated Vietnamese language newspaper in Toronto, usually contain many advertisements placed by garment manufacturers seeking Vietnamese labour. An example of such an advertisement appeared in both English and Vietnamese in the October 8, 1998 edition: "Wanted!! Experienced Sewing Machine Operator With Own Single and Serger Machine".

Lam (1996) found that a number of his Chinese-Vietnamese informants had given up hope of achieving worthwhile employment in the mainstream economy and had opened up small businesses, particularly restaurants and groceries. Gold (1992, 1993) writes of a similar response among Chinese-Vietnamese in Southern California to institutional barriers and blocked socioeconomic mobility. In Orange County, California "Little Saigon", a large enclave of co-ethnic commercial and service establishments for mostly owned by Chinese-Vietnamese, has arisen. In contrast to the apparent Chinese-Vietnamese proclivity towards employment in self-owned businesses, the census data make it clear that a turn to self-employment is not common among ethnic Vietnamese in Toronto. In fact, the enumerated population of Vietnamese ethnic origin exhibited lower levels of self-employment compared to the total population of the CMA as a whole as well as most of the other minority groups.

Many Vietnamese have utilized friendship and kinship networks to pool socioeconomic resources and achieve economic self-sufficiency in spite of their marginalized position within the mainstream economy. This phenomenon of resource pooling has been well-documented in the literature on Vietnamese socioeconomic adaptation in the U.S. (Haines, Rutherford, and Thomas, 1981; Haines, 1988; Caplan, Whitmore, and Choy, 1989; Kibria, 1989; Kibria, 1993; Kibria, 1994; Zhou and Bankston, 1994; Hung and Haines, 1996; Zhou and Bankston, 1998). I have observed a similar economic survival strategy practiced among many Vietnamese families in the Toronto area. Vietnamese households are often large, consisting of older parents and numerous grown children as well as young people. The members of the household typically contribute their various sources of income (paycheck, cash earned from "informal sources", and government social assistance checks) to the female parent. This older woman, in turn, decides how the total sum should best be used to meet the needs of the individual members and the family as a whole.

In my extensive interactions with Vietnamese individuals in Toronto I have observed a number of extended families who have utilized just such a strategy to achieve a variety of goals intended to improve the long-term socioeconomic trajectory of the household. These families usually consist of several adult members who have pooled their resources to help pay for the university schooling of young family members as well as to purchase single-family homes in outlying areas of the metropolitan area. In sum, the family functions together as a cohesive economic unit combining enough resources for subsistence despite the often meager financial contributions of individual members.

To Chapter 10


Abstract/Acknowledgements/Table of Contents - [ Chapters - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 ] -  Appendices - References Cited


Back to Top

     

titlebanner2.gif (103 bytes)