Immigrants'
Economic Status in Toronto:
Rethinking Settlement and Integration Strategies
(Full Text Version)
|
ŠLucia Lo, Valerie Preston, Shuguang Wang, Katherine Reil, Edward
Harvey & Bobby Siu
This paper is presented for discussion and comments. A revised version of this paper
will appear as a chapter in the volume Integrating Diversity, to be published by
CERIS-Toronto in 2001. The authors acknowledge support from the Major Projects
Initiative of CERIS-Toronto.
Although the Toronto CMA (Census Metropolitan
Area) has one-twelfth of Canadas population, it is home to approximately 43 percent
of Canadas recent immigrants. For its size, Toronto has three times as many
immigrants as the rest of Canada and a much larger share of recent arrivals (City of
Toronto Planning Department 1998). Since most immigrants are of working age, their
economic participation, performance, and impact are of the utmost importance for both the
immigrants themselves and Canadian society.
Immigrants participate in the labour market in three
different ways: salaried employees, self-employed individuals, and entrepreneurs employing
others. Their performance and success are often measured by their ability to achieve
income parity with native-born Canadians and linked to their socioeconomic assimilation.
Historically, the majority of immigrants have achieved some degree of economic success in
the Canadian labour market. Upon entry, many immigrants earned wages and salaries lower
than the earnings of comparable Canadian-born workers. But as length of residence in
Canada increased, their earnings approached, and sometimes exceeded, those of
Canadian-born workers. However, recent trends have led many analysts to question this
benign historical view of immigrants economic integration. Since the 1980s,
immigrants earnings have stalled and are not converging on those of comparable
Canadian-born workers (DeVoretz 1985; Ley 1998; Reitz 1997). At a national level, there is
also growing evidence that visible minority workers, many of whom have arrived since 1980,
are stuck disproportionately at the bottom of the economic ladder (Akbari 1999; Lian and
Matthews 1998; Reitz 1998).
Two factors have been proposed to explain immigrants
recent economic performance: changes in local labour demand and local labour supply. In
Toronto, deindustrialization since the 1970s has resulted in the loss of many
manufacturing jobs; at the same time, employment in service sectors expanded (Norcliffe et
al. 1986; Berridge et al. 1995). Different skills and experience are required for service
and manufacturing jobs, contributing to the feminisation of the workforce. Labour demand
in service industries is also bifurcated between well-paid, highly skilled professional
positions and poorly paid, semi-skilled and non-skilled jobs. Since 1980, more newcomers
have come from Asia, Africa, Latin and South America, and the Caribbean than from Europe.
Until the mid-1990s, the share of immigrants admitted on the grounds of family
reunification increased steadily; however, since 1994, trends have reversed. Independent
and business immigrants account for a growing share of all immigrants. Many family-class
immigrants are considered to have poor economic prospects in the new service-based economy
(DeVoretz 1995).
Against the backdrop of industrial restructuring, many
immigrants see self-employment and small business creation as an alternative to working as
employees. The rate is slightly higher among immigrant men than native-born men, 16.6
percent versus 14.2 percent. Previous studies (Razin and Langlois 1995) have shown
tremendous variations in the rates of self-employment for immigrant groups in Canadian
cities and among those who are self-employed, an ethnic division of labour in which
immigrant groups specialize in various industries. The impact of these ethnic businesses
and their implications for the employment and incomes of immigrants are still debated.
Some authors emphasize that ethnic businesses create job opportunities for immigrants who
are unlikely to find other employment, while others highlight the low salaries, poor
working conditions, and limited opportunities for advancement that characterize many jobs
in ethnic businesses (Liu 1995).
Despite the rise of self-employment and small business
development, there is growing evidence that many immigrants, particularly recent arrivals,
women, and members of visible minorities, are encountering barriers in their quest for
employment and entrepreneurial opportunities. One national study (Lian and Matthews 1998)
found persistent differences in earnings among various immigrant groups, even when
demographic and linguistic variables are controlled. A recent study by Ornstein (1996)
acknowledges that some visible minority groups have low levels of education that
contribute to high rates of poverty and unemployment. The findings underscore previous
evidence (Ley and Smith 1997; Basavarajappa and Halli 1997; Kazemipur and Halli 1997;
Sloan and Vaillancourt 1994; Li 1996; Marr and Siklos 1994; Harvey and Wortley 1993;
Daenzer 1991) of significant differences in the economic achievement and assimilation of
men and women from different immigrant groups. In this period of rapid economic change,
with its diverse consequences for immigrants, public concern about the economic impact of
immigrants on the host society has increased.
Existing studies seldom consider the many aspects of
Immigrants' economic experiences outlined above. The diverse economic experiences of
immigrants in Toronto have not been documented comprehensively. In this chapter, we
analyze variations in the work and income experiences of Toronto's immigrants, as well as
their economic impact on the host society. We aim to outline the current state of
knowledge about the economic experiences of immigrants in Toronto and to identify research
and policy gaps that impede efforts to facilitate immigrants' successful settlement.
The chapter is divided into four sections. In the first
section we examine the changing division of labour by gender and ethnicity since 1971 as a
result of deindustrialization, and compare the industrial distribution of employment of
immigrants with that of Canadian-born workers. In the second section we attempt to uncover
the extent of immigrant entrepreneurial activities in Toronto, the nature and structure of
various ethnic economies, and their role and impact on the overall economy. Specifically,
we want to find out why some immigrant groups are more entrepreneurial than others, what
makes for successful enterprising, who benefits from this entrepreneurial behaviour, and
what the pros and cons of ethnic economies are. Within the context of the industrial
division of labour and self-employment activities provided in the first two sections, the
third analyses the economic performance of Toronto's immigrants, which both reflects
Immigrants' well being and has a major influence on their economic contribution to
Canadian society. The analysis considers how the period of arrival in Canada and
individual differences (to the extent that they are captured by gender and visible
minority status) affect earnings, unemployment rates, and poverty rates. In the last
section, we address the concerns of the Canadian public by exploring the economic impact
of Toronto's immigrants on Canadian society. Specifically, we assess Immigrants' net
contributions to the Toronto economy and, in a limited way, compare the contributions of
different classes of immigrants.
Our attempt to explore in the same paper Immigrants'
economic activities, performance, and impact necessitates the use of information drawn
from a variety of sources, including previous research, unpublished studies, and original
analysis of census and administrative data. It is inevitable that the data sometimes cover
different time periods or use different classification schemes. Some information refers to
1996, some to the period between 1980 and 1995, and some to 1991. Nonetheless, these
sources provide the most contemporary information available at the time of preparing this
paper, and all of the sources contribute to our analysis of the period from 1971 to the
present.
IMMIGRANTS AND EMPLOYMENT IN THE TORONTO LABOUR MARKET
Since 1971, a series of empirical studies has highlighted
the industries employing immigrants living in Toronto. Many immigrants work in a few
industries, specifically, the goods-producing sectors of manufacturing and construction
and certain consumer services (Preston and Giles 1997; Mata 1996; Richmond 1992). The
industrial concentration of immigrants that is associated with low occupational status and
low wages (Badets and Howatson-Lee 1998; Ornstein 1996; Richmond 1992; Reitz 1990, 1998)
is also affected by ethnic origin and gender. Immigrants from different ethnic backgrounds
often work in different industries as do immigrant men and women.
Turning first to ethnic origin, three types of immigrant
workers have been identified. They include well-established immigrants similar to
Canadas charter ethnic groups of French and British who are mainly from the United
Kingdom, Western and Northern Europe, and the United States and have employment patterns
similar to those of the Canadian-born. Postwar immigrants from Italy, Portugal, Greece,
and Eastern Europe form a second type whose incomes have increased fairly steadily despite
concentrations of employment in construction, manufacturing, and consumer services.
Despite their diverse countries of origin, immigrants from Asia, Africa, the Caribbean,
and Central and South America, many of whom are visible minorities, are disproportionately
concentrated in declining industries and in those that offer insecure and poorly paid
employment (Mata 1996; Preston and Giles 1997; Reitz 1998).
Gender alters the effects of ethnic origin on Immigrants'
employment (Boyd 1991; Preston and Giles 1996; Ornstein 1996; Reitz 1990, 1998; Richmond
1992). Immigrant women often work in different industries than immigrant men from the same
ethnic group and in different industries than immigrant and Canadian-born women of the
same ethnic background (Reitz 1990; Ornstein 1996). Gender effects differ among ethnic
groups. Liu (1997) found no gender differences in the work histories of immigrants from
Mainland China. He attributes the lack of gender effects to the particular history of this
immigrant group, many of whom were admitted to Canada as permanent residents after the
Tiananmen Square incident. Men and women were equally likely to be well-educated students
who had been studying abroad at the time they decided to settle permanently in Canada.
Immigrants' Employment in Toronto, 1996
In 1996, immigrants are significant participants in the
Toronto labour market where immigrant men and women each account for almost one quarter of
the workforce, 24.9 percent and 21.6 percent, respectively. Looking at the composition of
the workforce for major industries, longstanding gender differences consistent with those
reported nationally (Statistics Canada 1998) are evident for Canadian-born and immigrant
workers (Table 1). Many women work in service industries, particularly consumer
services, health and education services, and finance, insurance, and real estate services,
while men are more likely to work in the goods-producing industriesCconstruction and
manufacturingCand in the distributive servicesCtransportation, utilities, communication,
and wholesale trade. Employment in accommodation, food, and beverage services is an
exception to this pattern of gender differences. Among the Canadian-born, women and men
have almost equal shares of employment in the industry, 22.8 percent versus 21.0 percent.
The relationship is reversed for immigrant workers. Immigrant women are 24.5 percent of
the workforce, while immigrant men are 31.7 percent. The large number of male immigrant
workers may indicate difficulty finding suitable employment. Immigrants settle for jobs in
the accommodation, food, and beverages sector because entry costs are low, skill
requirements are minimal, and other job opportunities are not available to them (Waldinger
1996).
TABLE 1
Shares of Employment by Industry, Gender, and Birthplace: 1996 |
| |
Birthplace |
| |
Canadian |
Immigrant |
Industry |
Shares |
Shares |
| |
Women |
Men |
Women |
Men |
| Manufacturing |
14.6 |
28 |
20.6 |
36.8 |
| Construction |
7.5 |
42 |
4.6 |
45.9 |
| Regulated Utilities |
19.1 |
40.6 |
11.6 |
28.7 |
| Wholesale |
21 |
37.2 |
15.3 |
26.5 |
| Retail |
29 |
27.5 |
20.9 |
22.5 |
| F.I.R.E. |
31.5 |
23.8 |
26.1 |
18.6 |
| Business |
27.7 |
31.3 |
18 |
22.9 |
| Government |
29.5 |
35 |
18.3 |
17.2 |
| Education |
43.1 |
19.7 |
22.7 |
14.5 |
| Health and Social |
41.7 |
10.3 |
38 |
10 |
| Accommodation |
22.8 |
21 |
24.5 |
31.7 |
| Other Services |
28.4 |
26.4 |
25.5 |
19.7 |
| N |
15643 |
16809 |
12829 |
15194 |
Calculations by authors
Each row sums to 100.0 percent
Source: Statistics Canada 1999 |
Analysis of the proportions of immigrant men and women's
total employment in each industry highlights the importance of manufacturing jobs for
immigrant workers. The sector employs 16.8 percent of immigrant women and 25.5 percent of
immigrant men ( Table 2). Immigrants' continued reliance on manufacturing jobs as a
major source of employment, at a time when employment in the sector is declining, renders
them vulnerable to layoffs and unemployment. The unstable nature of employment in the
other industries where large proportions of immigrants work underscores their
vulnerability. For immigrant men, seasonal and cyclical construction jobs account for 8.9
percent of all their jobs, whereas for immigrant women, other services, a catchall
category for many consumer services, in which insecure and poorly paid jobs predominate,
comprise 9.9 percent of all their jobs. Furthermore, only small proportions of immigrant
men and women work in educational, government, and business services, service sectors
where, traditionally, employment has been well paid and secure.
TABLE 2
Percentages of Employment and Location
Quotients by Industry , Gender , and Birthplace: 1996 |
| |
Birthplace |
| |
Canadian |
Immigrant |
Industry |
Percent |
Percent |
Location
Quotient |
| |
Women |
Men |
Women |
Men |
Women |
Men |
| Manufacturing |
9.8 |
17.5 |
16.8 |
25.5 |
1.72 |
1.45 |
| Construction |
1.4 |
7.3 |
1.1 |
8.9 |
0.75 |
1.21 |
| Regulated Utilities |
5.3 |
10.5 |
3.9 |
8.2 |
0.74 |
0.8 |
| Wholesale |
5.3 |
8.7 |
4.7 |
6.9 |
0.89 |
0.79 |
| Retail |
13.2 |
11.6 |
11.6 |
10.6 |
0.88 |
0.91 |
| F.I.R.E. |
10.6 |
7.4 |
10.7 |
6.5 |
1.01 |
0.87 |
| Business |
11.4 |
11.9 |
9 |
9.7 |
0.8 |
0.81 |
| Government |
4.6 |
5 |
3.5 |
2.7 |
0.76 |
0.54 |
| Education |
10.6 |
4.5 |
6.8 |
3.7 |
0.64 |
0.81 |
| Health and Social |
13.5 |
3.1 |
15 |
3.3 |
1.11 |
1.08 |
| Accommodation |
5.3 |
4.5 |
6.9 |
7.6 |
1.31 |
1.67 |
| Other Services |
9 |
7.8 |
9.9 |
6.4 |
1.09 |
0.82 |
| Calculations by authors
Each column of percentages sums to 100.0 percent. |
Location quotients that compare the proportions of
immigrant women's employment in each industry with those of Canadian-born women and the
proportions of immigrant men's employment with those of Canadian-born men confirm the
vulnerability of immigrant workers. Immigrant women's jobs are concentrated in
manufacturing with lesser concentrations in the accommodation, food, and beverage services
(Table 2). Immigrant men are overrepresented in construction as well as manufacturing
and accommodation, food, and beverage services. Location quotients less than 1.00 indicate
that immigrant workers of both sexes are underrepresented in many service industries
including distributive services, retail trade, and business, educational, and government
services.
The location quotients reveal that immigrant women are more
likely than immigrant men to work in growing service industries such as finance,
insurance, and real estate services (Economic Council of Canada 1991). Immigrant men's
proportions of employment in finance, insurance, and real estate and in other services are
less than those of Canadian-born men, while immigrant women's proportions of employment in
these industries are approximately equal to those of Canadian-born women. Immigrant
women's parity with Canadian-born women's employment in the industry is a hopeful sign
that the employment circumstances of some immigrant women have improved.
Despite the growing importance of self-employment in the
Canadian economy (Statistics Canada 1998), the vast majority of immigrant workers in
Toronto are employees. In Toronto, the proportion of immigrant women who are self-employed
is identical to the proportion for Canadian-born women, 8.4 percent, while a slightly
higher proportion of immigrant men than Canadian-born men are self-employed, 17.0 percent
versus 14.7 percent. There is little evidence that, in aggregate, immigrants are more
likely than the Canadian-born to be self-employed.
Hours of work are also very similar for immigrant and
Canadian-born workers in Toronto. The majority of people work fulltime, at least 30 hours
per week, although women are more likely than men to work fewer hours. Canadian-born and
immigrant women both work part-time at approximately twice the rate of men. For example,
more than 20.0 percent of immigrant women in Toronto work part-time compared with 10.0
percent of immigrant men. Part-time work is slightly more common among Canadian-born women
than among immigrant womenC26.9 percent versus 20.0 percent. Economic necessity may well
account for the slightly lower rate of participation of immigrant women in part-time work.
The Impact of Ethnic Origin
Gender structures the industrial division of labour in
Toronto, but its effects interact with those of colour, birthplace, and ethnicity. Ethnic
origin, as described by self-reported ethnicity, affects rates of self-employment and
industry of employment with little impact on hours of work. Regardless of their
birthplaces and ethnic origins, men are more likely to be self-employed than women. While
the proportions of self-employment for immigrant men range from 37.1 percent to 9.7
percent and those for Canadian-born men range from 37.7 percent to 5.2 percent, those for
immigrant and Canadian-born women range between 20.5 percent and 2.7 percent
(Table 3). The variations in the proportions of self-employed workers among ethnic
groups are much greater than the differences between Canadian-born and immigrant workers
from the same ethnic background. Self-employment is more common among Jewish, Chinese, and
other European immigrants than among any other ethnic group.
| TABLE 3
Self-Employment by Ethnic Origin, Gender and
Birthplace: 1996 |
| Percentage |
| Ethnic Origin |
Women |
Men |
| |
Immigrant |
Canadian |
Immigrant |
Canadian |
| Charter |
9.6 |
8.4 |
17.4 |
14.5 |
| Polish |
8.7 |
6.1 |
16.7 |
21.7 |
| Ukrainian |
8.6 |
11.4 |
18.7 |
17.9 |
| Italian |
8.8 |
5.8 |
23.8 |
12.7 |
| South European |
6.9 |
4.6 |
16.7 |
9.8 |
| Jewish |
20.5 |
17.6 |
37.1 |
37.7 |
| Other European |
14.8 |
8.9 |
23.3 |
14.1 |
| African and Caribbean |
3.2 |
5.5 |
10.3 |
4.1 |
| West Asian |
7.2 |
2.8 |
24.1 |
8.3 |
| South Asian |
5.7 |
2.7 |
12.9 |
5.2 |
| Chinese |
11.3 |
9.3 |
18.2 |
8.3 |
| East and Southeast Asian |
6.8 |
8.9 |
10.0 |
15.3 |
| Central and South American |
5.5 |
9.1 |
9.7 |
6.7 |
| Other |
8.7 |
9.2 |
16.2 |
14.8 |
| Calculations by authors
Columns sum to 100.0. |
There are substantial ethnic differences in Immigrants'
industries of employment. Location quotients were calculated to identify the industries in
which immigrants from each ethnic group are overrepresented and those in which they are
underrepresented. The importance of manufacturing jobs crosses all ethnic and gender
groups. For immigrant women, 11 of 13 location quotients exceed 1.0 and for immigrant men,
13 of 13 exceed 1.0 (Table 4). Immigrant workers of both sexes are also concentrated
in accommodation, food, and beverage services where the location quotients for 9 of 13
ethnic groups exceed 1.0 for men and 10 of the 13 location quotients for women exceed 1.0.
Without exception, immigrant men and women are underrepresented in government services
where every location quotient is less than 1.0 and almost equally underrepresented in
regulated utilities. Immigrants from most ethnic groups are also excluded from education
and, ominously, business services.
| TABLE 4a
Location Quotients for Immigrant Women by
Industry and Ethnic Origin, 1996 |
| Ethnic Origin |
Industry |
| |
Manufacturing |
Construction |
Regulated
Utilities |
Wholesale |
Retail |
F.I.R.E. |
Business |
Government |
Education |
Health
and
Social |
Accommodation |
Other |
| Charter |
1.28 |
0.80 |
1.24 |
1.17 |
0.88 |
1.14 |
1.03 |
0.48 |
0.61 |
1.29 |
0.87 |
1.10 |
| Polish |
2.15 |
1.08 |
0.52 |
1.05 |
0.73 |
0.59 |
0.58 |
0.35 |
0.36 |
1.26 |
3.02 |
1.26 |
| Ukrainian |
1.38 |
0.00 |
0.84 |
0.28 |
0.79 |
0.84 |
0.53 |
0.00 |
1.41 |
1.22 |
2.83 |
1.49 |
| Italian |
2.45 |
3.21 |
0.64 |
0.80 |
1.37 |
1.07 |
0.30 |
0.47 |
0.94 |
0.68 |
0.88 |
0.84 |
| South European |
2.51 |
1.18 |
0.39 |
0.59 |
0.85 |
0.96 |
0.58 |
0.25 |
0.44 |
0.89 |
1.87 |
1.83 |
| Jewish |
0.85 |
0.31 |
0.49 |
0.58 |
1.06 |
0.87 |
0.93 |
0.23 |
1.57 |
1.53 |
1.16 |
1.22 |
| Other European |
1.24 |
1.60 |
0.85 |
0.65 |
1.16 |
1.09 |
1.02 |
0.35 |
1.09 |
0.98 |
0.97 |
1.20 |
| African and Caribbean |
1.35 |
0.49 |
0.97 |
0.69 |
0.79 |
1.01 |
0.86 |
0.46 |
0.34 |
2.01 |
1.38 |
0.98 |
| West Asian |
0.95 |
0.26 |
0.40 |
1.15 |
1.63 |
0.84 |
0.85 |
0.15 |
0.88 |
1.25 |
2.04 |
0.92 |
| South Asian |
2.56 |
0.38 |
0.96 |
1.29 |
0.85 |
1.07 |
0.88 |
0.46 |
0.67 |
0.92 |
1.02 |
0.61 |
| Chinese |
2.31 |
0.42 |
0.69 |
1.15 |
0.85 |
1.45 |
0.99 |
0.33 |
0.52 |
0.78 |
1.47 |
0.78 |
| East and Southeast Asian |
1.58 |
0.25 |
0.61 |
0.86 |
0.95 |
0.99 |
0.56 |
0.22 |
0.23 |
1.50 |
1.76 |
1.96 |
| Central and South American |
1.41 |
1.02 |
0.81 |
1.17 |
1.15 |
0.63 |
0.54 |
0.41 |
0.27 |
1.13 |
1.44 |
2.38 |
| Other |
1.38 |
0.49 |
0.78 |
0.94 |
0.85 |
1.00 |
1.13 |
0.55 |
0.90 |
1.21 |
1.19 |
1.06 |
| Calculations by authors. |
| TABLE 4b
Location Quotients for Immigrant Men by
Industry and Ethnic Origin, 1996 |
| Ethnic Origin |
Industry |
| |
Manufacturing |
Construction |
Regulated Utilities |
Wholesale |
Retail |
F.I.R.E. |
Business |
Government |
Education |
Health |
Accommodation |
Other |
| Charter |
1.34 |
1.15 |
1.22 |
1.13 |
0.56 |
1.14 |
1.04 |
0.84 |
1.04 |
0.87 |
0.65 |
0.62 |
| Polish |
1.87 |
2.52 |
0.98 |
0.73 |
0.86 |
0.40 |
0.57 |
0.32 |
0.59 |
0.57 |
1.21 |
0.68 |
| Ukrainian |
1.50 |
0.91 |
0.67 |
0.96 |
0.85 |
0.76 |
0.74 |
0.62 |
1.87 |
1.19 |
1.31 |
0.77 |
| Italian |
1.32 |
4.25 |
0.91 |
0.56 |
1.01 |
0.75 |
0.25 |
0.56 |
0.91 |
0.37 |
0.53 |
0.85 |
| South European |
1.63 |
3.53 |
0.68 |
0.65 |
0.78 |
0.64 |
0.31 |
0.25 |
0.40 |
0.55 |
1.71 |
1.00 |
| Jewish |
1.13 |
0.85 |
0.49 |
0.94 |
0.97 |
1.24 |
1.24 |
0.46 |
1.04 |
2.15 |
0.96 |
0.80 |
| Other European |
1.54 |
1.73 |
0.96 |
1.00 |
0.70 |
0.91 |
0.91 |
0.63 |
0.88 |
0.81 |
0.66 |
0.72 |
| African and Caribbean |
1.70 |
0.91 |
1.29 |
0.76 |
1.02 |
0.59 |
0.71 |
0.53 |
0.42 |
1.09 |
1.46 |
0.75 |
| West Asian |
1.07 |
0.83 |
0.92 |
0.86 |
1.75 |
0.70 |
0.65 |
0.43 |
0.62 |
1.04 |
2.41 |
0.73 |
| South Asian |
1.93 |
0.40 |
0.89 |
0.96 |
0.97 |
0.89 |
0.81 |
0.59 |
0.45 |
0.86 |
1.71 |
0.50 |
| Chinese |
1.37 |
0.51 |
0.56 |
1.14 |
0.89 |
1.29 |
0.96 |
0.45 |
0.62 |
0.93 |
2.71 |
0.58 |
| East and Southeast Asian |
2.26 |
0.34 |
0.49 |
0.63 |
0.98 |
0.80 |
0.53 |
0.41 |
0.50 |
1.67 |
1.83 |
0.88 |
| Central and South American |
2.17 |
1.61 |
0.69 |
0.56 |
0.87 |
0.57 |
0.53 |
0.14 |
0.28 |
0.92 |
1.34 |
1.22 |
| Other |
1.43 |
0.83 |
0.69 |
0.87 |
0.91 |
1.10 |
0.92 |
0.62 |
1.08 |
1.02 |
1.46 |
0.87 |
| Calculations by authors. |
Gender differences cut across the ethnic division of
labour. Immigrant women often work in other services and health and social services, while
the vast majority of immigrant men are excluded from other services. Construction is an
important source of employment for immigrant men from several ethnic groups: Italian,
Polish, Southern European, British, French, and Latin, Central, and South American, while
it is relatively unimportant for immigrant women. Even
where the location quotients exceed 1.0, the numbers of
immigrant women working in the construction industry are small compared with those
employed in manufacturing and other services.
Comparing the location quotients among ethnic groups rather
than industries, offers some evidence of the three employment patterns identified in
previous research. Jewish and Charter immigrants stand out with location quotients close
to 1.0 in business services and finance, insurance, and real estate, while their location
quotients in manufacturing are relatively low. There are also large concentrations of
Jewish immigrant women in health and social services and education, services where jobs
have been stable and well paid. Ukrainian immigrants, a long-established ethnic group,
have remarkably similar employment patterns, suggesting that in Toronto they are attaining
the same economic success that has been observed earlier for Jewish, British, American,
and Northern European immigrants.
The location quotients highlight the persistent
concentration of Polish, Italian, and Southern European immigrants in the goods-producing
sector (Table 4). The manufacturing location quotients for women from these ethnic
groups exceed 2.0. These women are also concentrated in construction, perhaps because of
involvement in family businesses, particularly on the part of Italian women. Construction
is also an important source of men's employment for these ethnic groups with location
quotients that exceed 1.0 by a wide margin. The reliance on goods-producing sectors is
balanced by under-representation in business, government, and health services, where the
location quotients are low for men and even for women. Italian immigrants have the most
extreme concentration in goods-producing industries accompanied by the greatest
under-representation in services. One example is business services where the location
quotient for Italian immigrant men is 0.25. Although the earnings of these immigrants from
Southern and Eastern Europe who immigrated mainly in the 1960s and 1970s have increased,
their failure to penetrate the dynamic service industries indicates the lingering effects
of limited education. Many immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe were skilled
tradespeople but lacked the formal education that is often required in business, finance,
insurance, and real estate services; government; and health, social, and educational
services.
Despite the continuing concentration of recent immigrants
in manufacturing, their employment patterns differ from those of Southern and Central
European immigrants in three respects. First, men from Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean are
underrepresented in construction, perhaps because of the importance of ethnic networks in
this industry (Waldinger 1996). Only immigrant men from Central and South America have a
location quotient for construction greater than 1.0 (Table 4). Secondly, retail and
wholesale trade are important sectors of employment for women from Asia and South and
Central America. Chinese men are also involved in these sectors, perhaps a continuation of
their historic roles as traders. Thirdly, African, Caribbean, and Chinese immigrants of
both sexes have location quotients that approach or exceed 1.0 for finance, insurance, and
real estate services, a promising indication that some recent immigrants are finding jobs
outside the declining manufacturing sector (Table 4).
Period of Arrival and the Industrial Division of Labour
Period of arrival, which is related to the ethnic origin of
immigrants, also exerts an independent influence on their employment patterns. Although
concentrated initially in less-desirable jobs in declining sectors, with time, immigrants
are expected to achieve parity in wages and in the industrial division of employment
(DeVoretz 1985; Ley 1998). The literature suggests that recent immigrants may concentrate
in declining economic sectors because they have difficulty satisfying employers'
requirements for Canadian experience and Canadian education and training (Boyd 1991; Reitz
1990; Seward and Tremblay 1987). They also have had less time to develop social networks
that are crucial sources of information about job vacancies, personal recommendations, and
even job offers. Sassen (1990) has argued that the growth of business and financial
services in Aglobal@ cities has also increased demand for immigrant workers to fill poorly
paid and often insecure jobs in declining industrial sectors.
In Toronto, the exposed economic situations of recent
immigrants who arrived between 1991 and 1996 are apparent in their industries of
employment, but not in their hours of work nor their propensity for self-employment. Only
two effects of years of residence in Canada are discernible. Immigrant women who arrived
before 1966 are more likely to work part-time than other female immigrant workers.
Immigrant men who arrived before 1966 are also more likely than other male immigrant
workers to be self-employed. Apart from these early immigrants, period of arrival does not
influence hours of work or self-employment.
Immigrants' industries of employment are also not
influenced much by period of arrival. Correlation analysis indicated that period of
arrival is not related to the proportions of immigrant men and women in each industry. For
immigrant women, correlation coefficients that range from 0.86 to 0.98 reveal high levels
of association between the sectoral distributions of female workers from all periods of
arrival. The coefficients for male workers are slightly lower, ranging from 0.68 to 0.92,
but all are significant (p<0.05). Regardless of length of residence in Canada,
employment concentrations persist in manufacturing, while immigrants are underrepresented
in several service industries, particularly government and business services.
Discussion
Analysis of the 1996 census has confirmed that in the
Toronto labour market, immigrants are still concentrated in manufacturing, an economic
sector that has suffered major job losses over the past three decades. This concentration
is accompanied by an almost uniform under-representation in business and government
services, sectors where job growth has occurred since 1971. There are some encouraging
signs of change. Ukrainian immigrants have employment patterns similar to those of Jewish,
British, and American immigrants. On the basis of their industries of employment,
Ukrainian workers no longer fit with other Southern and Central European immigrants. Among
immigrants from Asia and Africa, the proportions of workers from each ethnic group
employed in finance, insurance, and real estate services is almost equal to the
proportions for Canadian-born workers. Chinese immigrants of both sexes along with men and
women from selected Asian origins are also having success in retail trade. Employment in
these service sectors does not imply that immigrant workers are all in well-paid, secure
employment; however, their increasing presence in the expanding service industries
promises improved economic prospects.
Differentiation of immigrants on the basis of ethnic origin
and gender continues. Even at the aggregate level of 13 ethnic groups, three types of
groups emerged. The composition of the three types has changed slightly with the inclusion
of Ukrainians in the first, most successful type, but otherwise, the three types have
persisted since 1971. Within the third type, where the majority of recent immigrants are
found, a shared concentration of employment in manufacturing and accommodation, food, and
beverage services and a shared exclusion from employment in business and government
services are the main common elements. Employment in other service sectors remains very
diverse. Asian, Caribbean, and African immigrants seem to have had more success entering
expanding service sectors than immigrants from Central and South America. In this respect,
the findings confirm Mata's (1996) assertion in 1991 that Central and South American
immigrants were at the greatest disadvantage in the Toronto labour market.
Immigrants' industries of employment are also structured by
gender effects that cut across ethnic differences in complex ways. Immigrant women are the
most vulnerable group of workers. More reliant than immigrant men and Canadian-born
workers of both sexes on manufacturing jobs, immigrant women are most likely to suffer
layoffs and unemployment as jobs disappear in this sector. Furthermore, immigrant women
are underrepresented in educational and government services that offer more remunerative
and stable employment to Canadian-born women. At the same time, many immigrant women work
in accommodation, food, and beverages services that are notorious for precarious and
poorly paid jobs. Nevertheless, not all immigrant women are equally vulnerable. In
aggregate, immigrant women emerged as the most precariously employed group, however, their
employment patterns are diverse. Jewish, British, Ukrainian, and American immigrant women
are employed in reasonable numbers in expanding service sectors. Although the success of
women from these ethnic groups does not outweigh the disadvantages suffered by the
majority of immigrant women, the success of some immigrant women bodes well for the future
of others. The industrial division of labour changes slowly, but the recent success of
some immigrant women who are employed successfully in growing economic sectors indicates
that gender and ethnic disadvantage can be overturned.
IMMIGRANT ENTREPRENEURS AND ETHNIC ECONOMIES
One avenue for economic success is entrepreneurship,
however, the literature on immigrant entrepreneurship and ethnic economies is bewildering
because of its convoluted terminology. The three terms entrepreneurship, business, and
economy with their two prefixes immigrant and ethnic are often used interchangeably
although there are subtle differences among them. Entrepreneurship refers to the
initiative and ability to create a business entity of any size, solely or jointly with
others. An entrepreneur is a self-employed individual although self-employment is not
analogous to entrepreneurship. Such businesses are termed immigrant businesses if they are
owned and managed by immigrants. They are known as ethnic businesses if reference is
specifically made to the cultural and national background of their owners. An ethnic
business is not necessarily an immigrant business. An immigrant economy refers generally
to the subeconomy of businesses created and maintained by immigrant members of a society.
An ethnic economy refers to a subset of enterprises due to efforts of a specific ethnic
group. Since most of our immigrants are of ethnic backgrounds other than English and
French, this section refers only to two terms: immigrant entrepreneurs and ethnic
economies.
The entrepreneurial activities conducted by immigrants to
Toronto are diverse. The rate of self-employment varies tremendously among immigrant
groups, ranging from 22.3 percent for Koreans to 1.6 percent for Somalis (Statistics
Canada 1996c). The most entrepreneurial immigrant groups are generally from Europe,
especially Poland and Israel, the origins of many German and Jewish immigrants. The least
entrepreneurial are mostly visible minority immigrants from the Caribbean, Southeast Asia
and Africa. Male immigrants are also more entrepreneurial than female immigrants. An
ethnic division of labour accompanies immigrant entrepreneurship (Razin and Langlois
1995). Germans from USSR, Jews from Poland, and Italians have a high stake in the
manufacturing and construction industries. Korean, Chinese, Greek, Israeli, and Middle
Eastern immigrants concentrate in the distributive services: trade, food services, and
transportation. Those from the U.S., Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and South Africa focus on
business, personal, and public services.
Ethnic economies are similarly varied, ranging from a few
restaurants and grocery stores mainly serving a specific ethnic group to one with a full
range of economic activities serving a mixed clientele. While the new Somali,
Ethiopian/Eritrean, and Maltese economies are representative of the former, the large
Chinese and East Indian economies tend to the latter (Lo and Wang 1998; Marger 1989).
These ethnic economies are sometimes visible in a single concentration such as the Malta
Village at St. Clair Avenue and Dundas Street and the Portugal Village bounded by Dundas
Street West, College Street, and Spadina and Ossington Avenues. Others extend across
several separate locations. For example, South Asian commercial activities are found along
Gerrard Street in East York, the Tuxedo Court Complex at Markham Road and Highway 401 in
Scarborough, and the Ruby Queen Plaza at Airport and Derry Roads in Malton, and Italian
businesses abound on St. Clair Avenue West and in the Town of Woodbridge. Alternatively,
ethnic businesses may be dispersed throughout the metropolitan area. For example,
Korean-owned convenience stores are all over the city despite the location of Koreatown on
Bloor Street West.
This section reviews the emergence of immigrant
entrepreneurship in Toronto, explores the varying representations of its ethnic economies,
and examines the impact of immigrant entrepreneurial endeavours. We use a Chinese case
study to illustrate the interdependence between immigrant entrepreneurship and ethnic
economies, and the impact of immigration policies on ethnic businesses and the economies
they comprise. The following terms are defined for the discussion that follows. While we
refer to Aethnic@ as a specific cultural group, Aco-ethnic@ means belonging to the same
ethnic group, and Anon-ethnic@ means not belonging to that particular group. We also
define Aminority@ as the opposite of majority and visible minority as the racially
distinct.
Rise of Immigrant Entrepreneurship: Resources or
Opportunities
There are three competing explanations for different rates
of entrepreneurial activities among immigrant groups. The blocked mobility thesis sees
self-employment as a survival mechanism or a withdrawal response under discriminatory
conditions (Light 1972, 1979; Portes and Bach 1985). The Amiddleman minority@ and
Asojourning communities@ theories focus on entrepreneurship as an effective vehicle for
improving social and economic status (Bonacich 1973; Bonacich and Modell 1980). The third
explanation says unique characteristics of immigrant groups, such as merchant ideology and
ethnic solidarity, predispose some groups towards business development (Light 1972).
A comprehensive argument that elucidates differences in
Immigrants' entrepreneurial behaviour has been proposed by Waldinger et al. (1990). They
argue that ethnic and class resources such as kinship networks, rotating credit
associations, unpaid family workers, a large co-ethnic labour pool, advanced education,
and access to capital (Light 1984; Lee 1992; Bates 1994) opportunity structures that
include policies concerning the establishment, ownership, and operation of businesses
(Rath 1999) and strategies with regards to resource mobilization and marketing interact to
influence entrepreneurial behaviour. Variations in these elements explain the economic
niches filled by different immigrant groups within the same area and the different
economic niches filled by any one group in different areas. This interactive model appears
to explain the entrepreneurial activities of Toronto's immigrants.
In Toronto, there is limited support for the blocked
mobility hypothesis (Marger 1989; Rhyne 1982; Uneke 1994). While Bogue and Shakeel (1979)
and Henry (1993) found perceived discrimination in employment high among Blacks and South
Asians, only a few of the Blacks and South Asians in Uneke (1994) and Marger (1989)
mentioned discrimination or lack of employment as a reason for self-employment. Pull and
push factors encouraged visible minority entrepreneurs to go into business (Rhyne 1982;
Uneke 1994). While pull factors, such as being one's own boss and being financially
successful, are cited more often as reasons for going into business than push factors,
such as poor pay, lack of advancement opportunities, and unrecognized qualifications,
individual groups do feel push factors differently. For example, Japanese and South Asians
are critical of insufficient chance for advancement, Chinese deplore the poor pay they
receive as employees, and Blacks consider both factors important.
In contemporary entrepreneurial pursuits, the class
component of education, wealth, and knowledge is found to be more important than the
presence of ethnic networks and ethnic solidarity. It accounts for the various business
participation rates of immigrant groups. In their study of Toronto's Chinese, East Indian,
and Black communities, Chan and Cheung (1985), Marger (1989), and Uneke (1994) showed the
insignificance of traditional collective financing such as rotating credit associations in
contemporary visible minority business development. Instead, class assets mattered more.
Recent Chinese and South Asian immigrants are wealthier and more educated. Education not
only affects business operation, but also access to capital. Banks are more willing to
give credit to those who can readily offer collateral or who have a reputation for
business success. Black entrepreneurs have difficulty getting bank financing partly
because of a lack of requisite collateral and partly because of the perceived higher
failure rate. The effects of limited access to financing are heightened by their lack of
business experience. As Uneke (1994) observed, more Chinese than Blacks have business
experience through participation in family business. That more Chinese than other
minorities were admitted into the country under the business immigrant programs highlights
the correlation between class resources and entrepreneurship in the minds of policy makers
(Marger and Hoffman 1992).
While class resources help with business startups, ability
to sustain the business, in various degrees, depends on ethnic resources. Portuguese real
estate brokers rely on kinship networks and community ties in opening and operating their
business (Teixeira 1998). Chinese entrepreneurs view the use of co-ethnic workers and the
huge size of the Chinese ethnic market as very important to business success (Chan and
Cheung 1985; Ma 1999). The East Indian community, although opting for a more
individualistic approach to business development, sees family members and co-ethnic
workers as a major resource (Marger 1989). Similarly, Jewish and Italian businesses employ
many co-ethnic workers (Reitz 1990). On the contrary, Blacks do not have a unified market.
While the Chinese, Portuguese, and East Indian communities are culturally, and in some
cases linguistically, homogeneous and have fairly institutionally complete ethnic
economies, the Black community, separated by different cultural origins and historical
experiences, has a fragmented social structure and no coherent community (Head 1975; Uneke
1994). Black entrepreneurship is hence constrained by both class and ethnic resources.
Class and ethnic resources can play complementary roles.
Smaller businesses, including those financed by personal resources, often rely on ethnic
resources. Larger businesses, however, can do without them. For example, a bipolar
business class is present among the Chinese immigrants, the earlier and poorer arrivals
relying mostly on ethnic resources and recent more affluent arrivals on class resources
(Chan and Cheung 1985; Thompson 1989).
While necessary for business success, neither ethnic nor
class resources are a sufficient condition for ethnic entrepreneurial activity. Also
important is the kind and scope of business opportunities provided by the social,
political, and economic environment into which immigrants settle. These include market
conditions, and institutional policies on access to business ownership. Market conditions
can stimulate demand for certain goods and services. The ethnic market provides the first
window of opportunity, with the size of the ethnic population a good indicator. The rapid
growth of the culturally distinct Chinese and South Asian communities in the last two
decades explains the proliferation of ethnic shopping malls. There are currently over
sixty Chinese and at least two South Asian shopping malls/plazas within the Toronto CMA,
all catering specifically to co-ethnic clients. While ethnic, shopping mall development is
a fairly recent phenomenon, its impact cannot be ignored. Then, there is the open market.
Immigrants can establish a foothold in this market by carving out a niche in serving
markets abandoned by large retail chains or shunned by the dominant population.
Chinese-owned laundries and grocers of the past, current Korean-owned convenience stores
and dry-cleaning businesses, and South Asian participation in taxi-cab and gas station
operations are some examples. Alternatively, they can establish a niche if they possess
the right knowledge and skills. In Toronto, we have seen how opportunities in the
construction industry became available to Italians during the Depression, and how Chinese
immigrants from Hong Kong have gradually taken over the garment industry from the Jewish.
More recently, Saxenian (1999) reported on the proliferation of Chinese and East Indian
entrepreneurship in the computer technology sector in Silicon Valley. The same trend is
emerging in Toronto. For example, a recent count of computer wholesale and manufacturing
firms in Toronto shows a 33 percent Chinese ownership (Fairchild TV 1998).
Black entrepreneurs have not been exposed to favourable
market conditions. Intragroup diversity limits the cultural market. Their focus on
hairstyling and cosmetics for Black customers provides few opportunities for growth due to
the abundance of similar firms in the open market. They are not helped by other factors in
the opportunity structure equation. While the federal government and Ontario provincial
government operate small business loan programs in which the government acts as a
guarantor to bank loans on new ventures, prospective proprietors must provide an equity
contribution to qualify. The equity requirement restricts Blacks more than it restricts
other immigrant groups who lack personal and collective resources.
Toronto case studies confirm that institutional
discrimination is no longer a satisfactory explanation for the continued interest of some
immigrant groups in self-employment (Light 1980). However, the perception of limited
mobility as employees, held by certain immigrant groups, may drive up self-employment
rates, while perceived disadvantages in access to business loans may discourage others
from going into business, hence shaping differences in the self-employment rate. The
complexity underlying immigrant entrepreneurship confirms Waldinger's (1990) interactive
theory of group resources and opportunity structure. Toronto's immigrant business owners
have an Aentrepreneurial mentality.@ Their dependence on class rather than ethnic
resources makes some groups more entrepreneurial than others. If immigrant self-employment
is seen as a positive trait, it is perhaps encouraging to note that the rate increases
with length of residence, the mix between co-ethnic clients and non-ethnic clients
increases with Canadian business experience, and class resources allow diversification
into nondistributive sectors and entry into the wider market (Lo and Wang 1998; Ma 1997,
1999; Marger 1989).
Status of Ethnic Economies: Enclave or Mix
Ethnic economy can be broadly defined as an ethnic-based
economic structure consisting of a set of enterprises all owned and managed by members of
the same ethnic group. It designates a business and employment sector that coexists with
the metropolitan economy. Enclave economy, ethnic economy, and mixed economy denote
variations in the mix of ethnicity of their workers and clients, in the kind of goods and
services they offer, in the market space they command, and in the degree of formality in
such organizational behaviour as capital financing and hiring practices (Jones and McEvoy
1996; Light et al. 1994; Nee et al. 1994; Rhyne 1982).
An enclave economy is one in which all business owners,
employees, and clients are of the same ethnicity. Its evolution and sustenance is largely
due to ethnic resources and cultural practices. Firms are very small and generally cluster
where the ethnic group resides to better serve better the ethnic market with low-order
ethnic goods and/or mid-order non-ethnic services. Informal economic practices are
commonly alleged to be an integral part of an enclave economy. An ethnic economy of
self-employed and co-ethnic employees differs from an enclave economy in two aspects.
Firms neither target co-ethnic clients nor cluster spatially. They locate within and
outside ethnic areas and serve as intermediaries selling cultural products to tourists or
non-cultural goods and services to other underserved minority populations. A mixed economy
consists of hybrid firms that utilize both ethnic and non-ethnic resources and embody both
formal and informal organizational behaviour. Their markets are spatially and ethnically
unbounded. Their businesses, not confined to general retailing, may include manufacturing,
specialist retailing, and service provision for consumers as well as producers. The above
describe ideal types. In reality, an enclave economy is a special case of an ethnic
economy, and a mixed economy cannot exist without some traces of an ethnic economy. While
no standard measures exist, knowledge of the size, composition and market orientation of
immigrant firms are often used to infer the type of subeconomy to which an ethnic economy
belongs.
There are few studies of ethnic economies in Toronto. Any
information is usually subsumed in discussions of the history and development of specific
ethnic groups (e.g., Zucchi 1988; Thompson 1989) or amid discussions of immigrant
entrepreneurship. Information about the size and composition of immigrant economies is
often drawn upon surveys and/or ethnic business directories. For example, Rhyne (1982)
counted 1333 Chinese, 501 Black, 247 South Asian, and 139 Japanese businesses in 1979/80.
The type of subeconomy they belong to is related to their composition. The Chinese, Black,
and South Asian sub-economies consist mostly of service and food-related retail activities
whereas over half of the Japanese businesses are engaged in commercial and professional
activities. With respect to the service sector alone, Chinese focused on personal,
printing, and contractor services, Blacks on personal, entertainment, and real estate,
South Asians on insurance and travel services, and Japanese on automotive dealership,
instructional and personal services. The more diverse Japanese businesses show a more
mixed economy than the others. This is probably attributable to two historical events.
First, unlike Chinese and East Indians, early Japanese-Canadians had well-organized
religious and social institutions to assist their struggle against racism and political
persecution, which led to less restricted and more spatially scattered activities. Second,
the emergence of Japan as a wealthy industrialized nation after World War Two together
with its huge foreign investment has improved the economic positions of
Japanese-Canadians.
Ethnic businesses were relatively small (Rhyne 1982; Reitz
1990). In Rhyne (1982), 73 percent of the Black and 92 percent of the Chinese businesses
employed less than 20 workers, and, with the exception of the South Asians, only 16
percent to 28 percent of the businesses experienced a total sales volume of $1 million.
The South Asian subeconomy is less of an enclave and more mixed. Marger (1989) found that
the businesses of East Indians who make up the largest percentage of South Asians in
Canada serve both ethnic and non-ethnic populations. The Indian Bazaar on Gerrard Street
is patronized by South Asians from the entire metropolitan area. The non-ethnic sector,
which is found in dispersed locations, mainly in ethnically mixed areas such as Yonge
Street between Bloor Avenue and Dundas Street, sells clothing, small audio/video
equipment, houseware, furniture, toys, and accessories. In addition, Jones and McEvoy
(1996) found that in 1989, the local ethnic, non-local ethnic, local non-ethnic, and
non-local non-ethnic market shares of South Asian businesses in Toronto, Vancouver, and
Montreal were 8.7 percent, 29.5 percent, 33.0 percent, and 28.7 percent respectively. The
relative smallness of the ethnic spaces indicates a non-enclave economy, and one more of
Amiddlemen minority@ status.
The literature to date would say that only the Jewish and
the Chinese have ever had a well-developed enclave economy in Toronto (Hiebert 1993;
Thompson 1989; Marger and Hoffman 1992). Their residential concentrations coincide with
their business concentrations. Spatial clustering is presumably vital to the success of an
enclave immigrant economy. It acts as an incubator and provides a protected market as well
as an exclusive labour force. It facilitates linkages between co-ethnic suppliers and
gives rise to an agglomeration economy. It can even create a kind of ethnic central place,
a cultural and economic focus (Kaplan 1997; Logan et al. 1994; Waldinger et al.1990; Zhou
1998).
However, immigrant economies are not static. They shift in
response to both contextual and structural factors, and the kind of economy associated
with an immigrant group at any point in time reflects the mix in the segregating/blending
process (Nee et al. 1994). In general, the rise of a specific immigrant economy hinges
upon sufficient capital and initial entrepreneurial skills. It requires sustained
immigration to fuel consumer demand and labour supply. Its growth can be propelled or
impeded by government or institutional policies such as the earlier racial exclusion act,
the point system of assessing potential immigrants, the business immigrant program, and
various small business loan and special business procurement programs. The case study
below illustrates the arbitrariness of the three ideal types of ethnic economies, and the
dynamic relations among immigration policies, global restructuring, and ethnic economies.
A Case Study: Chinese Businesses and Their Subeconomy
The Chinese ethnic economy has undergone much change. The
first Chinese immigrants in Toronto, like their counterparts elsewhere, faced residential,
educational, and occupational segregation. Similar to what Anderson (1991) described of
Vancouver, institutional discrimination produced the enclave known as Chinatown prompting
their involvement in laundry and restaurant businesses. The enclave economy took shape at
the same time as many Chinese entrepreneurs served as middlemen. In 1923, the year when
the Exclusion Act effectively stopped the entry of Chinese into Canada, with a population
of 2500, they operated 203 restaurants, 47 laundries, and 9 grocers (Rhyne 1982). The
relatively large number of restaurants and laundries indicated a somewhat Abroader than
enclave@ economy among the earlier generation of Chinese immigrants. The Asuccess@ or
sustenance of this subeconomy was due to the extensive use of rotating credit
associations, networks based on village kinship, and a diligent work ethic.
The 20 years following the repeal of the Exclusion Act in
1947 was a period of transition. The subeconomy expanded to a size of 448 firms in 1966,
the year before the 1967 Immigration Act was introduced. The enclave part of the Chinese
subeconomy expanded to include export/import firms, gift shops, real estate, insurance and
travel agents, and a few professionals. The proportion of restaurants declined while that
of grocers increased (Table 5). The 1967 Immigration Act caused considerable change
in the size and structure of the Chinese ethnic economy. Chinese business diversified and
a true enclave economy emerged. This enclave economy, occurring in multiple locations, was
fuelled by demand rather than discrimination. The proliferation of Chinese businesses is
due to personal rather than group resources. The emergence of an immigrant middle class
has created the consumer demand and capital supply for the expansion of Chinese businesses
(Chan and Cheung 1985; Li 1992).
TABLE 5
Percent Chinese Businesses in Toronto |
Type |
1923 |
1966 |
1981 |
1994 |
| Laundries and cleaners |
18.0 |
32.6 |
|
|
| Food and grocers |
3.0 |
18.1 |
18.2 |
9.3 |
| Restaurants |
78.0 |
38.8 |
28.0 |
13.8 |
| General merchandise and other retailing |
|
2.2 |
30.4 |
19.2 |
| Financial, real estate, and other business
services |
|
1.3 |
4.8 |
16.2 |
| Medical and other professional services |
|
3.5 |
2.8 |
11.5 |
| Personal and recreational services |
|
0.7 |
3.6 |
10.9 |
| Household furniture and services |
|
|
7.3 |
11.7 |
| Automotive |
|
|
|
4.7 |
| Miscellaneous |
|
2.7 |
4.4 |
2.5 |
| |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: Adapted from Rhyne (1982), Thompson
(1989), and Wang (1996).
The business immigrant program that was promoted in the
1980s caused more significant changes. The three Chinese business telephone directories
together reported over 6000 non-overlapping Chinese businesses in 1997 (Lo 1998). While
many are of a retail and service nature serving the Chinese alone, a fair proportion seek
and succeed in going beyond the enclave market and middleman status. The Chinese
subeconomy has moved away from a traditional ethnic economy focusing on consumer goods and
services to one that covers nearly the whole array of industrial activities including
producer and advanced services.
In a recent study, Lo and Wang (1998) analyzed the Dun
and Bradstreet Business Directory and made the following observations about recent
Chinese business development in Toronto. First, Chinese businesses are no longer confined
to the retail sector. Of the 65 industrial categories outside of the primary and public
administration sectors, Chinese businesses are represented in 52. Chinese businesses are
not found in regulated business such as non-depository credit institutions, and rail and
air transportation. Second, the locations of Chinese businesses are shifting. On the one
hand, indicative of their enclave nature, many retail, service, and finance, insurance,
and real estate businesses are located in Chinese settlement concentrations. On the other
hand, manufacturing and wholesale firms, not necessarily seeking co-ethnic clients, are
dispersed across Toronto. Their location strategy is linked to industrial sectors and
networks rather than the word Aethnic@ (Zhou 1998). Third, Chinese firms are expanding.
Multiplant establishments have surfaced. While 57 percent of Chinese businesses still
employ less than 20 employees, 41 percent have a workforce between 20 and 199 people, and
the remaining 2 percent, covering a range of business types in wholesale, manufacturing,
realty, and accommodation, employ 200 to 750 workers. In terms of sales volume, while 26
percent made less than $1 million in 1997, slightly over 10 percent of the Chinese firms
exceed the $10 million mark. The study also noted that Chinese firms, while representing
0.1 percent of the total in Toronto, account for 1 percent of the top 1000 Toronto firms
in both employment and sales. In particular, one manufacturing firm, ATI Technology Inc.,
ranking among the top 200 in employment and sales in the whole Toronto sample of almost
650,000 businesses (Dun & Bradstreet Canada 1997, p. S6, E5), and being the third
largest hightech firm in Canada as well as the world's biggest maker of computer graphic
chips, is owned and operated by a former Hong Kong resident who immigrated to Toronto in
1985 (Acharya 1998). This is the largest Chinese-owned computer firm among many that were
established by highly skilled, middle-class immigrants from Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, and
elsewhere. Similar to Los Angeles (Saxenian 1999), Toronto is seeing the emergence of a
knowledge-based ethnic economy.
The Chinese ethnic economy is maturing. Its diversification
in size and composition is pointing towards both structural and functional integration of
Chinese businesses in Toronto. There is a two-tier ethnic economy or, as Lin (1995) and
Tseng (1994) said of New York and Los Angeles, two circuits of development. Given the
macro changes in the world system and the diversity of Chinese immigrants (Lo and Wang
1997), there exist a lower circuit of immigrant labour and petty capitalist incorporation
mostly from China and Vietnam, and an upper circuit of flight capital and high-skill
immigrants generally from Hong Kong and Taiwan investing in finance, real estate, advanced
services, and high technology. The upper circuit is apparent in the suburban proliferation
of Chinese shopping malls and industrial plants. The retail/commercial development at the
northeast corner of Kennedy and Steeles in Markham, which claims to be the largest Chinese
shopping area in North America, has become a Chinese central place. Industrial plants are
found in Scarborough, Brampton, and Woodbridge. These malls and complexes, many developed
or owned by non-Chinese locals, are products of contemporary immigrant societies. On the
one hand, their AChineseness@ adds to or detracts from the suburban landscape, depending
upon one's perspective (Preston and Lo 1999; Qadeer 1998; Wang 1999). On the other hand,
they reflect the size of the Chinese ethnic economy. Optimistically, a sizable mixed
economy, with its forward, backward, and lateral linkages, entails continuous exchange of
resources, commodities, and information among entrepreneurs, workers, and customers
belonging to different ethnic groups; gives rise to a more porous social boundary; and
paves the way for social and economic integration. At this point, it is too early to
conclude if the Chinese ethnic economy represents a success in terms of its size,
composition, and market spaces.
Impacts of Immigrant Enterprises: Positive or Negative
The greatest concern about ethnic economies revolves around
social and economic mobility and appropriate returns to human capital. Debates are largely
inconclusive. While there is evidence that self-employed immigrants can maintain a higher
social status and earn more than their comparable co-ethnics working in the general
economy (Portes and Jensen 1987; Wilson and Martin 1982), many self-employed work long
hours with help from unpaid family members. Nonetheless, entrepreneurship is regarded by
many as a bridge to economic mobility with expansion to a larger enterprise and a wider
market in mind. Immigrant entrepreneurs are often regarded as successful because they have
an edge over similar peripheral firms in the open economy and they can use language and
cultural barriers and ethnic affinities to gain market and labour access. However, they
also project an image of exploitation. As middlemen, they carry out the economic
directives of large firms in the general economy, and as employers, they often provide
immigrant workers with jobs, but jobs that often offer low pay and poor working
conditions. The empirical record is often inconsistent (Portes and Bach 1985; Sanders and
Nee 1987). In Toronto, the incomes in enclave employment differ among minority groups.
They are lower than average for the Chinese, Portuguese, and West Indians, and higher for
the Italians (Fong and Ma 1998; Liu 1995; Reitz 1990). A related concern about
participation in the enclave market is the possibility that it may prevent immigrant
workers from ever reaching the general labour market. However, job event history shows
that immigrant workers can move across ethnic boundaries and market sectors and away from
the informal ethnic domain to the formal market which offers better working conditions and
higher income (Nee et al 1994; Liu 1995).
A more positive view sees enclave employment as a way to
help new immigrants establish themselves. Even though the enclave labour market pays lower
wages, workers earn more than they would if they were unemployed (Nee et al. 1994). A
second argument stems from labour market segmentation theory, which says that immigrants,
as one marginalized group, are often employed in dead-end, low-skill jobs in the secondary
market. Even when employed, immigrant workers may end up with little career mobility. An
enclave economy at least offers immigrant workers a protected niche with some
opportunities for upward mobility, including self-employment (Portes and Bach 1985).
The enclave economy functions positively by providing
easily accessible jobs for immigrants, especially those who are newly-arrived and poorly
educated. However, it often has a negative impact on earnings at least in the initial
phases of settlement. In addition, while the ethnic economy provides an alternative avenue
for economic integration albeit at a lower level, participation in the enclave does not
necessarily provide job or life satisfaction. It may also hamper social participation in
the wider society, thereby inducing social isolation (Fong and Ooka 1999; Wilson 1996).
More generally, ethnic economies have positive benefits
that are difficult to measure but nonetheless significant. As an ethnic economy expands,
ethnic business organizations emerge. In addition to promoting entrepreneurship among
their members and forging internal cohesion, the organizations often open trade links and
promote business interaction between the communities where immigrants settle and those in
their countries of origin. Ethnic businesses also act as important agents for urban
renewal. For example, when the Portuguese community moved from Alexandra Park to the
Kensington Market area, Portuguese business soon revitalized the area (Teixeira 1998).
Ethnic economies may also have territorial impacts. The northward migration of the
Italians from the College-Spadina area to St. Clair West changed the area's retail
facades, rewriting its territorial history from Little Britain to Little Italy (Buzzelli
1998). Besides giving the neighbourhood a place identity, an ethnic economy also helps to
develop local ethnic identities (Zucchi 1988). The urban landscape that emerges may be a
source of ethnic pride for some but it is also a source of ethnic tension as diverse
immigrant groups make competing claims and learn to live with their other ethnic groups.
Discussion
Despite their proliferation, small businesses project
contradictory images. While they are hailed as the engine of growth in large urban
centres, they are also considered the economic lifeboats for many immigrants. The
literature has attended mainly to the social and economic structures within which
immigrant businesses are embedded while neglecting larger political and institutional
frameworks. Few empirical studies examine in detail the nature, structure, and dynamism of
ethnic economies. Studies of immigrant entrepreneurship, often relying on small-scale and
non-random surveys, are mostly exploratory. Investigations of ethnic economies are plagued
by data representation problems. The lack of a common database renders proper sampling of
ethnic businesses impossible. Ethnic yellow pages lean towards retail trade and are easily
outdated due to high rates of business failure and turnover. General business directories
such as the Dun & Bradstreet and the Scott Industrial Directories, while more
comprehensive in industrial representation, are biased towards larger businesses and
misrepresent ethnic economies that have a larger share of small businesses than the
general economy. A further complication is the presence of an informal economy that makes
data less reliable. Inconsistent study outcomes are the norm, leaving many research
questions unanswered.
Formal studies and anecdotal discussions of immigrant
entrepreneurship and ethnic economies focus on the economic incorporation of immigrants
and the social barriers they face. Immigrants are successful if they adopt formal
organizational behaviour, hire a moderate and not necessarily co-ethnic workforce, retain
diverse establishments, serve a mixed clientele, offer their workers wages comparable to
the general economy's, and generate sizable income. This assimilation perspective is often
glorified. While it is encouraging to see that some ethnic groups have expanded their
development path and are serving multiple markets, this perspective also has a negative
side. It encourages competition among immigrant groups. In discussing entrepreneurial
behaviour, the emphasis has been on social barriers with little attention paid to
governmental and other institutional barriers. The main concerns include minority groups'
access to capital and major financial institut