Immigrants
into Citizens: Political Mobilization in France And Canada |
By
Sarah Virginia Wayland
Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School
of The University of Maryland in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
1995
Advisory Committee:
Professor Ted Robert Gurr, Chairman/Advisor
Professor Mark J. Miller
Professor Martin O. Heisler
Professor Clarence Stone
Professor Jerald Hage
© Copyright by
Sarah Virginia Wayland
1995
Abstract/Preface/Dedication/Acknowledgements/Table of Contents/List
of Figures
Chapter 1 - Chapter 2 - Chapter 3 - Chapter 4 - Chapter 5 - Chapter 6 - Chapter 7 - Chapter 8 - Appendix/Bibliography
ABSTRACT
Title of Dissertation: IMMIGRANTS INTO CITIZENS: POLITICAL MOBILIZATION IN
FRANCE AND CANADA
Sarah Virginia Wayland, Doctor of Philosophy, 1995
Dissertation directed by: Ted Robert Gurr, Professor of Government and
Politics
University of Maryland College Park
The significant postwar migration of ethnoracial minorities from lesser
developed countries to industrial democracies has profound political implications. In
addition to challenges posed to the nation-state ideal in terms of citizenship and
diversity, this migration poses challenges to those immigrant minorities who want to
exercise political voice, often without citizenship. Using two case countries, Canada and
France, this dissertation uses a social movements framework to examine how immigrants and
their descendants meet this challenge.
For each country, three collective action efforts of the 1980s involving
immigrants and their descendants were considered. The issues are not immigration questions
but rather integration questions affecting the roles minorities assume in larger society.
In France, the cases are the movement for foreigners' voting rights in local elections,
mobilization against proposed reform of the French Nationality Code, and the "Muslim
headscarf affair." The Canadian cases were activism for more police accountability in
Metropolitan Toronto, mobilization for employment equity legislation in Ontario, and
demands for more culturally-sensitive social services. Most political activity was
organized through voluntary associations -- either communally-based or inter-ethnic -- and
included direct protest such as marches or even violence. For each issue, I examined the
evolution of the debate, collective action taken, and the outcomes. Information was
gathered through interviews and archival research in Paris and Toronto.
On a more theoretical level, this research explores what types of issues
engender mobilization and under what circumstances collective action is likely to be
successful. This comparative inquiry indicates that minority mobilization is shaped,
indeed constrained, by political opportunity structures (POS) in the country of
settlement. Of particular relevance to minority action are cultural components of POS,
including (1) the dominant model of minority incorporation, ranging from assimilation to
cultural pluralism; (2) the settlement country's understanding and definition of
citizenship; and (3) the historical importance of immigration to national development. In
addition, state-society relations -- especially the distinction between strong and weak
state traditions -- are considered. The findings of this research indicate that political
culture is indeed a determinant of mobilization demands and outcomes, a correlation which
is especially evident in France, a strong state.
PREFACE
In between the embryonic stages of this dissertation research and its
completion, momentous changes have occurred in the international system. With the
accelerating process of global integration and the end of the Cold War, increasing
attention is being paid to conflicts that have little to do with the forces of communism.
The conflicts of the 1990s instead center on identity issues, namely differences of
ethnicity, religion, and race. Transnational migration is both a cause and a consequence
of these conflicts. Neither the migration nor the conflicts are new, but, as we face the
close of the twentieth century, their salience has become such that they can no longer be
ignored.
Though in industrialized democracies these conflicts are rarely of the
life-threatening magnitudes seen in developing states, the arrival of millions of
immigrants from the far corners of the earth poses serious challenges to receiving
societies. These challenges include how to maintain national identity despite increasing
pluralism, how to ensure the participation and representation of ethnoracial minorities in
democratic states, and -- most seriously -- how to prevent the deterioration of ethnic and
race relations in times of economic hardship and uncertainty about the future. That these
challenges must be successfully met is imperative because, even as Western European and
North American states struggle to secure their borders, migration continues unabated.
Immigrants and their descendants must be incorporated into existing social fabrics, even
if doing so requires some alteration. If this dissertation contributes in a small way to
our understanding of how immigrants and ethnoracial minorities can best negotiate their
own incorporation into their settlement societies, it will have been worth the effort.
My own interest in migration issues dates to the spring of 1987, when I
took a semester abroad to live in Aix-en-Provence in the south of France. My first time
overseas, I was struck by the similarities of the situation of Muslim North Africans in
France with that of African-Americans in the United States. I was intrigued by this
variant of ethnic conflict on a personal level, and gradually came back to this interest
several years later in graduate school when I uncovered the rapidly growing literature on
transnational migration. This area of study ties together many of my interests, including
human rights, ethnic and race relations, the gap between the industrialized world and
lesser developed countries, social movements, the social implications of politics, and the
changing dimensions of international relations and of national security. I continue to be
fascinated by these subjects and amazed that until recently they have received so little
attention by political scientists. With the increased media and scholarly attention given
to protracted communal conflicts around the world, this appears to be changing.
DEDICATION
To my parents,
David and Virginia Wayland,
whose own passions for social justice
have served as an inspiration
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
There are many people who have made this dissertation possible, first
and foremost the interviewees who gave generously of their time, often when they had
little time to give. (For those who refused to return phone calls, I have less sympathy.)
Without the cooperation and candor of persons from immigrant associations, community
organizations, and government agencies, this study would have suffered greatly. Their
participation lies at the heart of this research.
This project never would have occurred had I not received financial
assistance to live abroad. A pre-dissertation fellowship from the Institute for European
Studies at Columbia University (1990) and a Fulbright award (1992-93) allowed me to
conduct research in Paris. A Canadian Studies graduate student fellowship from the
Canadian government (1992) and, most recently, the "Loukidelis Charity Fund"
provided funds for research in Toronto.
There are a number of professors and researchers who helped to shape the
direction of this research. In Paris, I owe particular thanks to Catherine Wihtol de
Wenden, Patrick Weil, and Pierre Favre. The resourceful staff at CIEMI and REMISIS,
Christine Pelloquin in particular, also deserve mention. In Toronto, Ted Richmond of OCASI
helped me to grasp the complexities of social service provision in Ontario. At the
University of Maryland, I thank my dissertation committee for wading through this large
document without complaint. I am especially grateful to Mark Miller, who commuted from the
University of Delaware for my defense so that I could make use of his immigration
expertise. His own dissertation research on the political activism of foreign workers in
France, Germany, and Switzerland served as the original inspiration for my own research.
The person who most influenced and supported my research agenda has of
course been my advisor, Ted Gurr. I was first motivated to undertake this research while
enrolled in his graduate seminar on civil conflict in 1989. Although at that time I was in
the master's program at Maryland, his seminar opened up a whole new field of interest to
me and ultimately led me to stay at Maryland to complete my Ph.D. His encouragement and
guidance inspired me to apply for -- and receive -- funding to study the political
situation of immigrants in France the following summer. Since that preliminary research,
Ted Gurr has helped me to modify research plans numerous times, never failing to support
my research and its (potential) importance. His gentle guidance and his abilities as a
teacher and a scholar provide a model that any graduate student would be honored to
emulate.
I owe other intellectual and emotional debts to a number of friends. To
name only a few, Beth Blake, Sara Hodges, and David Blatt have been real sources of peer
support. In addition to regular e-mail correspondance, Beth helped me to cope with the
administrative hassles of being a long-distance graduate student and has helped me to cope
in general. Sara was always armed with encouraging words and a perky wit, and David
empathized on the trials of dissertation research in France. If all students of social
movements were as entertaining as David, I should be quite content. I am also grateful to
the Maryland graduate students who participated in the Conflict Working Group of 1991-92
where I was first able to present and refine my research ideas.
Finally, I thank John Loukidelis who has encouraged me through the entire
process of dissertation research and writing. His tenacious support of my abilities has
been a source of courage. I made his acquaintance in the same months when I was beginning
to think about this research, and in the meantime we were married. Some projects take
longer than others...
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
Minorities of Immigrant Origin as Political Actors
Literature Review
Focus of this Research
Methodology
Overview of Chapters
CHAPTER TWO: MIGRATION, THE NATION-STATE, AND
NATIONAL IDENTITY STRUCTURES
Nationhood and Nation-State
The Nation-State under Pressure
The Nation-State Response: National Identity Structures
Comparing National Identity Structures: A Brief Look at the Case Countries
CHAPTER THREE: THE FRENCH REPUBLICAN TRADITION
A Strong State Tradition
Citizenship Tradition in France
History of Immigration
France's Foreign and Naturalized Population
The Assimilationist Machine in Question
CHAPTER FOUR: THE CANADIAN "MOSAIC"
A Weak State Tradition
Citizenship in a British Dominion
A Nation of Immigrants
Multiculturalism
Immigration during the 1980s and early 1990s
Mosaic Backlash?
CHAPTER FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES AND
MOBILIZATION IN FRANCE AND CANADA
Typology of Associations
Organization and Mobilization in France
Organization and Mobilization in Canada
CHAPTER SIX: MOBILIZATION AND ITS OUTCOMES IN
FRANCE
Local Voting Rights for Foreign Residents
Proposed Changes to the French Nationality Code
The Islamic Scarf Affair
Analysis and Conclusions
CHAPTER SEVEN: MOBILIZATION AND ITS OUTCOMES IN
CANADA
Police - Racial Minority Relations: Mobilization for Civilian
Investigation of Police Wrongdoing
Employment Equity in Ontario
Access to Social Services
Analysis and Conclusions
CHAPTER EIGHT: TOWARDS A THEORY OF MINORITY
MOBILIZATION
Summary of Research Framework
Research Results
Contribution of this Research
APPENDIX: IMMIGRANT, ETHNORACIAL MINORITY, AND
SOLIDARITY ORGANIZATIONS INTERVIEWED
BIBLIOGRAPHY
LIST OF FIGURES
Number
1. POLITICAL OPPORTUNITY
2. NATIONAL IDENTITY STRUCTURES
3. MOBILIZATION OUTCOMES, BASED ON POS
COMPONENTS
Next
Abstract/Preface/Dedication/Acknowledgements/Table of Contents/List
of Figures
Chapter 1 - Chapter 2 - Chapter 3 - Chapter 4 - Chapter 5 - Chapter 6 - Chapter 7 - Chapter 8 - Appendix/Bibliography
Back to Top
|